Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore

Introduction: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has attracted increasing attention, with institutions increasingly adopting this approach over conventional median sternotomy (MS). This study aimed to describe the outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in our institution as the only c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi Xian Ong, Duoduo Wu, Haidong Luo, Guohao Chang, Faizus Sazzad, Jai Ajitchandra Sule, Peggy Hu, Theo Kofidis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications 2022-11-01
Series:Singapore Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021136
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861045088747520
author Zhi Xian Ong
Duoduo Wu
Haidong Luo
Guohao Chang
Faizus Sazzad
Jai Ajitchandra Sule
Peggy Hu
Theo Kofidis
author_facet Zhi Xian Ong
Duoduo Wu
Haidong Luo
Guohao Chang
Faizus Sazzad
Jai Ajitchandra Sule
Peggy Hu
Theo Kofidis
author_sort Zhi Xian Ong
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has attracted increasing attention, with institutions increasingly adopting this approach over conventional median sternotomy (MS). This study aimed to describe the outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in our institution as the only centre with an established MICS programme in Singapore. Methods: Patients who had undergone cardiac procedures such as heart valve replacement or repair, coronary artery bypass grafting or atrial septal defect repair were included in the study. We analysed 4063 patients who had undergone MS and 390 patients who had undergone MICS between January 2009 and February 2020. Results: Over the years, the number of MICS procedures performed increased, along with an increase in MICS operations with two or more concomitant cardiac procedures and a decrease in postoperative length of stay. Compared with patients who underwent MS, those who underwent MICS had shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who underwent MICS had lower rates of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.021), reoperation (P = 0.028) and prolonged ventilation (P < 0.001). However, the rates of other postoperative complications were comparable between patients who underwent MICS and those who underwent MS. Conclusion: In our institution, MICS is a safe, reproducible and efficacious technique that yields superior outcomes compared with conventional MS procedures, in some aspects. The results of this study provide further evidence and support towards adopting the minimally invasive approach to cardiac surgery in a carefully selected group of cardiac patients in Singapore.
format Article
id doaj-art-98ad00456efe458b9c771c885ff40067
institution Kabale University
issn 0037-5675
2737-5935
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Singapore Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-98ad00456efe458b9c771c885ff400672025-02-10T05:47:06ZengWolters Kluwer – Medknow PublicationsSingapore Medical Journal0037-56752737-59352022-11-01631164164810.11622/smedj.2021136Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in SingaporeZhi Xian OngDuoduo WuHaidong LuoGuohao ChangFaizus SazzadJai Ajitchandra SulePeggy HuTheo KofidisIntroduction: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has attracted increasing attention, with institutions increasingly adopting this approach over conventional median sternotomy (MS). This study aimed to describe the outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in our institution as the only centre with an established MICS programme in Singapore. Methods: Patients who had undergone cardiac procedures such as heart valve replacement or repair, coronary artery bypass grafting or atrial septal defect repair were included in the study. We analysed 4063 patients who had undergone MS and 390 patients who had undergone MICS between January 2009 and February 2020. Results: Over the years, the number of MICS procedures performed increased, along with an increase in MICS operations with two or more concomitant cardiac procedures and a decrease in postoperative length of stay. Compared with patients who underwent MS, those who underwent MICS had shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who underwent MICS had lower rates of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.021), reoperation (P = 0.028) and prolonged ventilation (P < 0.001). However, the rates of other postoperative complications were comparable between patients who underwent MICS and those who underwent MS. Conclusion: In our institution, MICS is a safe, reproducible and efficacious technique that yields superior outcomes compared with conventional MS procedures, in some aspects. The results of this study provide further evidence and support towards adopting the minimally invasive approach to cardiac surgery in a carefully selected group of cardiac patients in Singapore.https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021136cardiac surgerydatabaseheart surgeryminimally invasive surgeryopen heart surgery
spellingShingle Zhi Xian Ong
Duoduo Wu
Haidong Luo
Guohao Chang
Faizus Sazzad
Jai Ajitchandra Sule
Peggy Hu
Theo Kofidis
Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore
Singapore Medical Journal
cardiac surgery
database
heart surgery
minimally invasive surgery
open heart surgery
title Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore
title_full Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore
title_fullStr Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore
title_short Comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low-risk mixed Asian population in Singapore
title_sort comparison of the safety and efficacy between minimally invasive cardiac surgery and median sternotomy in a low risk mixed asian population in singapore
topic cardiac surgery
database
heart surgery
minimally invasive surgery
open heart surgery
url https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021136
work_keys_str_mv AT zhixianong comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore
AT duoduowu comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore
AT haidongluo comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore
AT guohaochang comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore
AT faizussazzad comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore
AT jaiajitchandrasule comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore
AT peggyhu comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore
AT theokofidis comparisonofthesafetyandefficacybetweenminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryandmediansternotomyinalowriskmixedasianpopulationinsingapore