Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths

Descartes maintained that God freely created all eternal truths. Yet, while it is impossible for necessary truths to have been otherwise, if they are a matter of God’s free choice, then it seems that they could have been otherwise. Adrian W. Moore (2020) offers a solution to this conflict that, he...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Patterson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bucharest 2022-03-01
Series:Public Reason
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.publicreason.ro/pdfa/158
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860361701359616
author Sarah Patterson
author_facet Sarah Patterson
author_sort Sarah Patterson
collection DOAJ
description Descartes maintained that God freely created all eternal truths. Yet, while it is impossible for necessary truths to have been otherwise, if they are a matter of God’s free choice, then it seems that they could have been otherwise. Adrian W. Moore (2020) offers a solution to this conflict that, he claims, Descartes “could and should” have adopted. This article argues that Descartes’s position is in a sense closer to Moore’s solution than Moore permits, yet proposes an arguably more accurate account via the Cartesian relationship between omnipotence, indifference, and the dependence of the eternal truths on God. Omnipotence and indifference do not express that God might have created the necessary truths in another way, but rather that God’s decrees are in no way determined by anything other than God. Thus, alternative possibilities are not relevant to this account, since there were none before God’s creative act.
format Article
id doaj-art-9a6fa90b142542ac92c907058ee9eafe
institution Kabale University
issn 2065-7285
2065-8958
language English
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher University of Bucharest
record_format Article
series Public Reason
spelling doaj-art-9a6fa90b142542ac92c907058ee9eafe2025-02-10T14:47:01ZengUniversity of BucharestPublic Reason2065-72852065-89582022-03-0113(2)-14(1)13(2)-14(1)1125Descartes on Modality and the Eternal TruthsSarah Patterson0Birkbeck University of LondonDescartes maintained that God freely created all eternal truths. Yet, while it is impossible for necessary truths to have been otherwise, if they are a matter of God’s free choice, then it seems that they could have been otherwise. Adrian W. Moore (2020) offers a solution to this conflict that, he claims, Descartes “could and should” have adopted. This article argues that Descartes’s position is in a sense closer to Moore’s solution than Moore permits, yet proposes an arguably more accurate account via the Cartesian relationship between omnipotence, indifference, and the dependence of the eternal truths on God. Omnipotence and indifference do not express that God might have created the necessary truths in another way, but rather that God’s decrees are in no way determined by anything other than God. Thus, alternative possibilities are not relevant to this account, since there were none before God’s creative act.https://www.publicreason.ro/pdfa/158descartesgodeternal truthscreation doctrinemodalityindifferenceomnipotenceessencearithmeticaquinasadrian w. moore.
spellingShingle Sarah Patterson
Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths
Public Reason
descartes
god
eternal truths
creation doctrine
modality
indifference
omnipotence
essence
arithmetic
aquinas
adrian w. moore.
title Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths
title_full Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths
title_fullStr Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths
title_full_unstemmed Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths
title_short Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths
title_sort descartes on modality and the eternal truths
topic descartes
god
eternal truths
creation doctrine
modality
indifference
omnipotence
essence
arithmetic
aquinas
adrian w. moore.
url https://www.publicreason.ro/pdfa/158
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahpatterson descartesonmodalityandtheeternaltruths