Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study

Objectives An estimated 6%–10% of US adults took a hypnotic drug for poor sleep in 2010. This study extends previous reports associating hypnotics with excess mortality.Setting A large integrated health system in the USA.Design Longitudinal electronic medical records were extracted for a one-to-two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel F Kripke, Lawrence E Kline, Robert D Langer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2012-02-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000850.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858284989251584
author Daniel F Kripke
Lawrence E Kline
Robert D Langer
author_facet Daniel F Kripke
Lawrence E Kline
Robert D Langer
author_sort Daniel F Kripke
collection DOAJ
description Objectives An estimated 6%–10% of US adults took a hypnotic drug for poor sleep in 2010. This study extends previous reports associating hypnotics with excess mortality.Setting A large integrated health system in the USA.Design Longitudinal electronic medical records were extracted for a one-to-two matched cohort survival analysis.Subjects Subjects (mean age 54 years) were 10 529 patients who received hypnotic prescriptions and 23 676 matched controls with no hypnotic prescriptions, followed for an average of 2.5 years between January 2002 and January 2007.Main outcome measures Data were adjusted for age, gender, smoking, body mass index, ethnicity, marital status, alcohol use and prior cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) for death were computed from Cox proportional hazards models controlled for risk factors and using up to 116 strata, which exactly matched cases and controls by 12 classes of comorbidity.Results As predicted, patients prescribed any hypnotic had substantially elevated hazards of dying compared to those prescribed no hypnotics. For groups prescribed 0.4–18, 18–132 and >132 doses/year, HRs (95% CIs) were 3.60 (2.92 to 4.44), 4.43 (3.67 to 5.36) and 5.32 (4.50 to 6.30), respectively, demonstrating a dose–response association. HRs were elevated in separate analyses for several common hypnotics, including zolpidem, temazepam, eszopiclone, zaleplon, other benzodiazepines, barbiturates and sedative antihistamines. Hypnotic use in the upper third was associated with a significant elevation of incident cancer; HR=1.35 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.55). Results were robust within groups suffering each comorbidity, indicating that the death and cancer hazards associated with hypnotic drugs were not attributable to pre-existing disease.Conclusions Receiving hypnotic prescriptions was associated with greater than threefold increased hazards of death even when prescribed <18 pills/year. This association held in separate analyses for several commonly used hypnotics and for newer shorter-acting drugs. Control of selective prescription of hypnotics for patients in poor health did not explain the observed excess mortality.
format Article
id doaj-art-9dea85eca3d7463c834eb4444e99848a
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2012-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-9dea85eca3d7463c834eb4444e99848a2025-02-11T12:35:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552012-02-012110.1136/bmjopen-2012-000850Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort studyDaniel F Kripke0Lawrence E Kline1Robert D Langer2Scripps Clinic Viterbi Family Sleep Center, La Jolla, California, USAScripps Clinic Viterbi Family Sleep Center, La Jolla, California, USAJackson Hole Center for Preventive Medicine, Jackson, Wyoming, USAObjectives An estimated 6%–10% of US adults took a hypnotic drug for poor sleep in 2010. This study extends previous reports associating hypnotics with excess mortality.Setting A large integrated health system in the USA.Design Longitudinal electronic medical records were extracted for a one-to-two matched cohort survival analysis.Subjects Subjects (mean age 54 years) were 10 529 patients who received hypnotic prescriptions and 23 676 matched controls with no hypnotic prescriptions, followed for an average of 2.5 years between January 2002 and January 2007.Main outcome measures Data were adjusted for age, gender, smoking, body mass index, ethnicity, marital status, alcohol use and prior cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) for death were computed from Cox proportional hazards models controlled for risk factors and using up to 116 strata, which exactly matched cases and controls by 12 classes of comorbidity.Results As predicted, patients prescribed any hypnotic had substantially elevated hazards of dying compared to those prescribed no hypnotics. For groups prescribed 0.4–18, 18–132 and >132 doses/year, HRs (95% CIs) were 3.60 (2.92 to 4.44), 4.43 (3.67 to 5.36) and 5.32 (4.50 to 6.30), respectively, demonstrating a dose–response association. HRs were elevated in separate analyses for several common hypnotics, including zolpidem, temazepam, eszopiclone, zaleplon, other benzodiazepines, barbiturates and sedative antihistamines. Hypnotic use in the upper third was associated with a significant elevation of incident cancer; HR=1.35 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.55). Results were robust within groups suffering each comorbidity, indicating that the death and cancer hazards associated with hypnotic drugs were not attributable to pre-existing disease.Conclusions Receiving hypnotic prescriptions was associated with greater than threefold increased hazards of death even when prescribed <18 pills/year. This association held in separate analyses for several commonly used hypnotics and for newer shorter-acting drugs. Control of selective prescription of hypnotics for patients in poor health did not explain the observed excess mortality.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000850.full
spellingShingle Daniel F Kripke
Lawrence E Kline
Robert D Langer
Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study
BMJ Open
title Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study
title_full Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study
title_fullStr Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study
title_short Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study
title_sort hypnotics association with mortality or cancer a matched cohort study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000850.full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielfkripke hypnoticsassociationwithmortalityorcanceramatchedcohortstudy
AT lawrenceekline hypnoticsassociationwithmortalityorcanceramatchedcohortstudy
AT robertdlanger hypnoticsassociationwithmortalityorcanceramatchedcohortstudy