Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Direct and prolonged exposure to stress and uncertainty among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic likely had a significant negative impact on their mental health and general wellbeing. Although the contributors to such distress remain to be fully understood, the construct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea S. Stoltenberg, Veronica Ranieri, Hege Kristine N. Dahlen, Eleni Nastouli, SAFER Investigators, Roger Almvik, Sarah J. L. Edwards, Sunjeev K. Kamboj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87700-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862325210251264
author Andrea S. Stoltenberg
Veronica Ranieri
Hege Kristine N. Dahlen
Eleni Nastouli
SAFER Investigators
Roger Almvik
Sarah J. L. Edwards
Sunjeev K. Kamboj
author_facet Andrea S. Stoltenberg
Veronica Ranieri
Hege Kristine N. Dahlen
Eleni Nastouli
SAFER Investigators
Roger Almvik
Sarah J. L. Edwards
Sunjeev K. Kamboj
author_sort Andrea S. Stoltenberg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Direct and prolonged exposure to stress and uncertainty among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic likely had a significant negative impact on their mental health and general wellbeing. Although the contributors to such distress remain to be fully understood, the construct of perceived coercion appears to be relevant. Among HCWs, perceived coercion is conceptualised as appraisals about lack of control/‘freedom to choose’ and pressure to perform patient-care duties in the context of unprecedented threat of contagion from patients. To improve our understanding of perceived coercion amongst HCWs, we developed a 10-item scale—the Pandemic-specific Perceived Coercion Scale for Healthcare Workers (PPCS-HCW) scale—designed to be adaptable and applicable for use in future mass-contagion emergencies. A preliminary (exploratory) factor analysis (N = 546) showed that relevant items coalesced around three factors—‘internal pressure’, ‘external pressure’ and ‘perceived coercion’, that partly overlap with previous conceptualisations of perceived coercion. The exploratory conceptual and psychometric structure was confirmed in a separate sample of HCWs from the UK and Norway (N = 483). On average, across the three PPCS-HCW scale factors, HCWs showed low levels of perceived coercion (M = 0.22 (95% CI [0.11, 0.33] on a − 3 to + 3 scale). However, cluster analysis identified three groups: low (− 1.09 (95% CI [− 1.20, − 0.99]), moderate (0.17 (95% CI [0.08, 0.25]) and high scoring (1.57 (95% CI [1.47, 1.67]) PPCS-HCW clusters. High scoring participants showed higher levels of psychological distress, avoidance coping and compassion fatigue. In summary, our findings suggest that perceived coercion is a relevant construct in understanding the adverse psychological impact of large-scale contagion emergencies on HCWs.
format Article
id doaj-art-a110ed4362ce4ea8bbaffec422a3ee4b
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-a110ed4362ce4ea8bbaffec422a3ee4b2025-02-09T12:32:41ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-02-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-87700-6Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemicAndrea S. Stoltenberg0Veronica Ranieri1Hege Kristine N. Dahlen2Eleni Nastouli3SAFER InvestigatorsRoger Almvik4Sarah J. L. Edwards5Sunjeev K. Kamboj6Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College LondonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College LondonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyCentre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College LondonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College LondonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College LondonAbstract Direct and prolonged exposure to stress and uncertainty among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic likely had a significant negative impact on their mental health and general wellbeing. Although the contributors to such distress remain to be fully understood, the construct of perceived coercion appears to be relevant. Among HCWs, perceived coercion is conceptualised as appraisals about lack of control/‘freedom to choose’ and pressure to perform patient-care duties in the context of unprecedented threat of contagion from patients. To improve our understanding of perceived coercion amongst HCWs, we developed a 10-item scale—the Pandemic-specific Perceived Coercion Scale for Healthcare Workers (PPCS-HCW) scale—designed to be adaptable and applicable for use in future mass-contagion emergencies. A preliminary (exploratory) factor analysis (N = 546) showed that relevant items coalesced around three factors—‘internal pressure’, ‘external pressure’ and ‘perceived coercion’, that partly overlap with previous conceptualisations of perceived coercion. The exploratory conceptual and psychometric structure was confirmed in a separate sample of HCWs from the UK and Norway (N = 483). On average, across the three PPCS-HCW scale factors, HCWs showed low levels of perceived coercion (M = 0.22 (95% CI [0.11, 0.33] on a − 3 to + 3 scale). However, cluster analysis identified three groups: low (− 1.09 (95% CI [− 1.20, − 0.99]), moderate (0.17 (95% CI [0.08, 0.25]) and high scoring (1.57 (95% CI [1.47, 1.67]) PPCS-HCW clusters. High scoring participants showed higher levels of psychological distress, avoidance coping and compassion fatigue. In summary, our findings suggest that perceived coercion is a relevant construct in understanding the adverse psychological impact of large-scale contagion emergencies on HCWs.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87700-6Perceived coercionScale validationPandemicHealthcare workersPsychological distress
spellingShingle Andrea S. Stoltenberg
Veronica Ranieri
Hege Kristine N. Dahlen
Eleni Nastouli
SAFER Investigators
Roger Almvik
Sarah J. L. Edwards
Sunjeev K. Kamboj
Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
Scientific Reports
Perceived coercion
Scale validation
Pandemic
Healthcare workers
Psychological distress
title Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort perceived coercion amongst healthcare workers during the covid 19 pandemic
topic Perceived coercion
Scale validation
Pandemic
Healthcare workers
Psychological distress
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87700-6
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasstoltenberg perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT veronicaranieri perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hegekristinendahlen perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT eleninastouli perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT saferinvestigators perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT rogeralmvik perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT sarahjledwards perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT sunjeevkkamboj perceivedcoercionamongsthealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic