Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic Variation

ABSTRACT Translocating individuals from multiple source populations is one way to bolster genetic variation and avoid inbreeding in newly established populations. However, mixing isolated populations, especially from islands, can potentially lead to outbreeding depression and/or assortative mating,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rujiporn Thavornkanlapachai, Harriet R. Mills, Kym Ottewell, Cathy Lambert, J. Anthony Friend, Daniel J. White, Zahra Aisya, W. Jason Kennington
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Evolutionary Applications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.70073
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206968393924608
author Rujiporn Thavornkanlapachai
Harriet R. Mills
Kym Ottewell
Cathy Lambert
J. Anthony Friend
Daniel J. White
Zahra Aisya
W. Jason Kennington
author_facet Rujiporn Thavornkanlapachai
Harriet R. Mills
Kym Ottewell
Cathy Lambert
J. Anthony Friend
Daniel J. White
Zahra Aisya
W. Jason Kennington
author_sort Rujiporn Thavornkanlapachai
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Translocating individuals from multiple source populations is one way to bolster genetic variation and avoid inbreeding in newly established populations. However, mixing isolated populations, especially from islands, can potentially lead to outbreeding depression and/or assortative mating, which may limit interbreeding between source populations. Here, we investigated genetic consequences of mixing individuals from two island populations of the dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) in an island translocation. Despite a high level of genetic divergence between the source populations (FST ranges 0.33–0.64), and significant differences in body size, individuals with different ancestries were able to successfully interbreed in captivity and in the wild. However, the genetic contributions from each source population were unequal initially despite each of the source populations contributing an equal number of founders. Mating success of captive animals based on the pedigree suggests that this bias toward one source population was due to founder mortality and the mating success of younger and heavier animals. Nevertheless, genetic contributions in the translocated population became equal over time with no parental purebreds, suggesting an extreme excess of hybrids across multiple years. While genetic variation in the translocated population was comparable or higher than the source populations, the increase was short‐lived. Genetic composition of captive animals may not reflect what happens in the wild. These changes post‐translocation highlight the need for continued genetic monitoring.
format Article
id doaj-art-a186ca6e164c4524b4e599059ade5d35
institution Kabale University
issn 1752-4571
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Evolutionary Applications
spelling doaj-art-a186ca6e164c4524b4e599059ade5d352025-02-07T03:58:50ZengWileyEvolutionary Applications1752-45712025-01-01181n/an/a10.1111/eva.70073Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic VariationRujiporn Thavornkanlapachai0Harriet R. Mills1Kym Ottewell2Cathy Lambert3J. Anthony Friend4Daniel J. White5Zahra Aisya6W. Jason Kennington7School of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia AustraliaDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Biodiversity and Conservation Science Bentley Western Australia AustraliaSchool of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia AustraliaDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Biodiversity and Conservation Science Bentley Western Australia AustraliaDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Biodiversity and Conservation Science Albany Western Australia AustraliaSchool of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia AustraliaSchool of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia AustraliaSchool of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia AustraliaABSTRACT Translocating individuals from multiple source populations is one way to bolster genetic variation and avoid inbreeding in newly established populations. However, mixing isolated populations, especially from islands, can potentially lead to outbreeding depression and/or assortative mating, which may limit interbreeding between source populations. Here, we investigated genetic consequences of mixing individuals from two island populations of the dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) in an island translocation. Despite a high level of genetic divergence between the source populations (FST ranges 0.33–0.64), and significant differences in body size, individuals with different ancestries were able to successfully interbreed in captivity and in the wild. However, the genetic contributions from each source population were unequal initially despite each of the source populations contributing an equal number of founders. Mating success of captive animals based on the pedigree suggests that this bias toward one source population was due to founder mortality and the mating success of younger and heavier animals. Nevertheless, genetic contributions in the translocated population became equal over time with no parental purebreds, suggesting an extreme excess of hybrids across multiple years. While genetic variation in the translocated population was comparable or higher than the source populations, the increase was short‐lived. Genetic composition of captive animals may not reflect what happens in the wild. These changes post‐translocation highlight the need for continued genetic monitoring.https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.70073body sizecaptive breedinggenetic erosionintraspecific hybridizationmate choicetranslocation
spellingShingle Rujiporn Thavornkanlapachai
Harriet R. Mills
Kym Ottewell
Cathy Lambert
J. Anthony Friend
Daniel J. White
Zahra Aisya
W. Jason Kennington
Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic Variation
Evolutionary Applications
body size
captive breeding
genetic erosion
intraspecific hybridization
mate choice
translocation
title Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic Variation
title_full Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic Variation
title_fullStr Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic Variation
title_full_unstemmed Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic Variation
title_short Diverged Populations Admixture Bolsters Genetic Diversity of a New Island Dibbler (Parantechinus apicalis) Population, but Does Not Prevent Subsequent Loss of Genetic Variation
title_sort diverged populations admixture bolsters genetic diversity of a new island dibbler parantechinus apicalis population but does not prevent subsequent loss of genetic variation
topic body size
captive breeding
genetic erosion
intraspecific hybridization
mate choice
translocation
url https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.70073
work_keys_str_mv AT rujipornthavornkanlapachai divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation
AT harrietrmills divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation
AT kymottewell divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation
AT cathylambert divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation
AT janthonyfriend divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation
AT danieljwhite divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation
AT zahraaisya divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation
AT wjasonkennington divergedpopulationsadmixturebolstersgeneticdiversityofanewislanddibblerparantechinusapicalispopulationbutdoesnotpreventsubsequentlossofgeneticvariation