Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England
Introduction Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England are tasked with making difficult decisions on which healthcare services to provide against the background of limited budgets. The question is how to ensure that these decisions are fair and legitimate. Accounts of what constitutes fair and...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Sarah Clark, Katharina Kieslich, Peter Littlejohns, Albert Weale |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015-07-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/7/e007908.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Contracting account audit on social networks
by: Jakovljević Nemanja, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Procedure for Handling 4-H Accounts: Audits
by: Marilyn N. Norman, et al.
Published: (2007-03-01) -
Procedure for Handling 4-H Accounts: Audits
by: Marilyn N. Norman, et al.
Published: (2007-03-01) -
The temporality of economic decisions applied to clinical reasoning
by: João Victor Almeida dos Santos, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Taxation of exports and imports of services: Automation of accounting and audit of transactions
by: Іryna Zhurakovska, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)