Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective Financial incentives associated with private insurance may encourage healthcare providers to perform more caesarean sections. We therefore sought to determine the association of private insurance and odds of caesarean section.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources MEDLINE,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ilir Hoxha, Medina Braha, Lamprini Syrogiannouli, David C Goodman, Peter Jüni, Bruno R da Costa |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017-08-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/8/e016600.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Perinatal consequences of a category 1 caesarean section at term
by: Sailesh Kumar, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study
by: Renee Y Hsia, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Incidental Unilateral Tubal Absence Detected During Caesarean Section: Report of a Case
by: Selçuk Erkılınç, et al.
Published: (2014-04-01) -
Use of assisted vaginal birth to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections and improve maternal and perinatal outcomes
by: Barbara, Nolens, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Towards developing new private sector obstetric care and contracting models in South Africa: Insights from public hospitals using private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries
by: G C Solanki, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)