From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuries

Background The use of standing electric motorized scooters (eScooters) has skyrocketed since its first release in 2016. This quickly popularized form of transportation has been associated with significant injury and even death. These eScooter-related traumatic injuries led to local advocacy efforts,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leslie M Kobayashi, Todd W Costantini, Jay J Doucet, Jarrett E Santorelli, Laura N Haines, Kendra M Black
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-02-01
Series:Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
Online Access:https://tsaco.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001440.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860070258049024
author Leslie M Kobayashi
Todd W Costantini
Jay J Doucet
Jarrett E Santorelli
Laura N Haines
Kendra M Black
author_facet Leslie M Kobayashi
Todd W Costantini
Jay J Doucet
Jarrett E Santorelli
Laura N Haines
Kendra M Black
author_sort Leslie M Kobayashi
collection DOAJ
description Background The use of standing electric motorized scooters (eScooters) has skyrocketed since its first release in 2016. This quickly popularized form of transportation has been associated with significant injury and even death. These eScooter-related traumatic injuries led to local advocacy efforts, resulting in safety restrictions including speed limit geofencing, sidewalk restrictions, and limiting the number of eScooter providers in high-density population areas. We hypothesized that these local safety restrictions decreased the number of eScooter-related injuries presenting to our trauma center. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of eScooter-crash patients presenting to our Level 1 trauma center from July 2018 to June 2023. Variables included patient demographics, injury severity score (ISS), and mortality. The primary outcome was the rate of eScooter patients presenting over time in relation to the implementation of local-regional safety regulations.Results A total of 381 patients presented after eScooter crashes. Males were 73.8% of patients. The average age was 38.6 years; 45+ years was the most common age group at 33%, followed by ages 25–34 (31%). The mean ISS was 9±6, with ISS 0–9 (65.1%), 10–15 (24.4%), 16–24 (8.4%), and >25 (20.1%). There were three (0.8%) deaths. The median number of eScooter patients per month with prespeed limits was nine and post five (p=0.005), showing a 44.4% decrease in injured patients. After February 2022 restrictions, the rate precipitously declined with a median of two (p=0.033), reflecting an additional 60% decrease in injured patients.Conclusion Local advocacy resulting in increased safety regulations was associated with a significant reduction in injured patients secondary to eScooter use. This demonstrates the importance of advocacy efforts in response to changes in injury patterns and mechanisms of injury. We believe that our work can serve as a model for other urban centers seeking to reduce eScooter-related injuries and implement effective safety measures.Level of evidence IV, prognostic/epidemiologic.
format Article
id doaj-art-abc29a4515bc44a886c94059f66c2c5d
institution Kabale University
issn 2397-5776
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
spelling doaj-art-abc29a4515bc44a886c94059f66c2c5d2025-02-10T16:50:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupTrauma Surgery & Acute Care Open2397-57762025-02-0110110.1136/tsaco-2024-001440From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuriesLeslie M Kobayashi0Todd W Costantini1Jay J Doucet2Jarrett E Santorelli3Laura N Haines4Kendra M Black5Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USADivision of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USADepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USADepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USADepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USADepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USABackground The use of standing electric motorized scooters (eScooters) has skyrocketed since its first release in 2016. This quickly popularized form of transportation has been associated with significant injury and even death. These eScooter-related traumatic injuries led to local advocacy efforts, resulting in safety restrictions including speed limit geofencing, sidewalk restrictions, and limiting the number of eScooter providers in high-density population areas. We hypothesized that these local safety restrictions decreased the number of eScooter-related injuries presenting to our trauma center. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of eScooter-crash patients presenting to our Level 1 trauma center from July 2018 to June 2023. Variables included patient demographics, injury severity score (ISS), and mortality. The primary outcome was the rate of eScooter patients presenting over time in relation to the implementation of local-regional safety regulations.Results A total of 381 patients presented after eScooter crashes. Males were 73.8% of patients. The average age was 38.6 years; 45+ years was the most common age group at 33%, followed by ages 25–34 (31%). The mean ISS was 9±6, with ISS 0–9 (65.1%), 10–15 (24.4%), 16–24 (8.4%), and >25 (20.1%). There were three (0.8%) deaths. The median number of eScooter patients per month with prespeed limits was nine and post five (p=0.005), showing a 44.4% decrease in injured patients. After February 2022 restrictions, the rate precipitously declined with a median of two (p=0.033), reflecting an additional 60% decrease in injured patients.Conclusion Local advocacy resulting in increased safety regulations was associated with a significant reduction in injured patients secondary to eScooter use. This demonstrates the importance of advocacy efforts in response to changes in injury patterns and mechanisms of injury. We believe that our work can serve as a model for other urban centers seeking to reduce eScooter-related injuries and implement effective safety measures.Level of evidence IV, prognostic/epidemiologic.https://tsaco.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001440.full
spellingShingle Leslie M Kobayashi
Todd W Costantini
Jay J Doucet
Jarrett E Santorelli
Laura N Haines
Kendra M Black
From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuries
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
title From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuries
title_full From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuries
title_fullStr From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuries
title_full_unstemmed From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuries
title_short From Peril to Protection: an evaluation of regulations impacting eScooter injuries
title_sort from peril to protection an evaluation of regulations impacting escooter injuries
url https://tsaco.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001440.full
work_keys_str_mv AT lesliemkobayashi fromperiltoprotectionanevaluationofregulationsimpactingescooterinjuries
AT toddwcostantini fromperiltoprotectionanevaluationofregulationsimpactingescooterinjuries
AT jayjdoucet fromperiltoprotectionanevaluationofregulationsimpactingescooterinjuries
AT jarrettesantorelli fromperiltoprotectionanevaluationofregulationsimpactingescooterinjuries
AT lauranhaines fromperiltoprotectionanevaluationofregulationsimpactingescooterinjuries
AT kendramblack fromperiltoprotectionanevaluationofregulationsimpactingescooterinjuries