4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)

Abstract Compactifications of 6d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0) SCFTs give rise to new 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 SCFTs and shed light on interesting dualities between such theories. In this paper we continue exploring this line of research by extending the class of compactified 6d theories to the D-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin Chen, Babak Haghighat, Shuwei Liu, Marcus Sperling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823863479754293248
author Jin Chen
Babak Haghighat
Shuwei Liu
Marcus Sperling
author_facet Jin Chen
Babak Haghighat
Shuwei Liu
Marcus Sperling
author_sort Jin Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Compactifications of 6d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0) SCFTs give rise to new 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 SCFTs and shed light on interesting dualities between such theories. In this paper we continue exploring this line of research by extending the class of compactified 6d theories to the D- type case. The simplest such 6d theory arises from D5 branes probing D-type singularities. Equivalently, this theory can be obtained from an F-theory compactification using −2- curves intersecting according to a D-type quiver. Our approach is two-fold. We start by compactifying the 6d SCFT on a Riemann surface and compute the central charges of the resulting 4d theory by integrating the 6d anomaly polynomial over the Riemann surface. As a second step, in order to find candidate 4d UV Lagrangians, there is an intermediate 5d theory that serves to construct 4d domain walls. These can be used as building blocks to obtain torus compactifications. In contrast to the A-type case, the vanishing of anomalies in the 4d theory turns out to be very restrictive and constraints the choices of gauge nodes and matter content severely. As a consequence, in this paper one has to resort to non- maximal boundary conditions for the 4d domain walls. However, the comparison to the 6d theory compactified on the Riemann surface becomes less tractable.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae8e67f32c29433ba1d1a6c97d67d309
institution Kabale University
issn 1029-8479
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of High Energy Physics
spelling doaj-art-ae8e67f32c29433ba1d1a6c97d67d3092025-02-09T12:06:18ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792020-01-012020113910.1007/JHEP01(2020)1524d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)Jin Chen0Babak Haghighat1Shuwei Liu2Marcus Sperling3CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesYau Mathematical Sciences Center, Tsinghua UniversityDepartment of Physics, Tsinghua UniversityYau Mathematical Sciences Center, Tsinghua UniversityAbstract Compactifications of 6d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0) SCFTs give rise to new 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 SCFTs and shed light on interesting dualities between such theories. In this paper we continue exploring this line of research by extending the class of compactified 6d theories to the D- type case. The simplest such 6d theory arises from D5 branes probing D-type singularities. Equivalently, this theory can be obtained from an F-theory compactification using −2- curves intersecting according to a D-type quiver. Our approach is two-fold. We start by compactifying the 6d SCFT on a Riemann surface and compute the central charges of the resulting 4d theory by integrating the 6d anomaly polynomial over the Riemann surface. As a second step, in order to find candidate 4d UV Lagrangians, there is an intermediate 5d theory that serves to construct 4d domain walls. These can be used as building blocks to obtain torus compactifications. In contrast to the A-type case, the vanishing of anomalies in the 4d theory turns out to be very restrictive and constraints the choices of gauge nodes and matter content severely. As a consequence, in this paper one has to resort to non- maximal boundary conditions for the 4d domain walls. However, the comparison to the 6d theory compactified on the Riemann surface becomes less tractable.https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)152Field Theories in Higher DimensionsSupersymmetric Gauge TheorySuper- symmetry and Duality
spellingShingle Jin Chen
Babak Haghighat
Shuwei Liu
Marcus Sperling
4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)
Journal of High Energy Physics
Field Theories in Higher Dimensions
Supersymmetric Gauge Theory
Super- symmetry and Duality
title 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)
title_full 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)
title_fullStr 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)
title_full_unstemmed 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)
title_short 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0)
title_sort 4d n mathcal n 1 from 6d d type n mathcal n 1 0
topic Field Theories in Higher Dimensions
Supersymmetric Gauge Theory
Super- symmetry and Duality
url https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)152
work_keys_str_mv AT jinchen 4dnmathcaln1from6ddtypenmathcaln10
AT babakhaghighat 4dnmathcaln1from6ddtypenmathcaln10
AT shuweiliu 4dnmathcaln1from6ddtypenmathcaln10
AT marcussperling 4dnmathcaln1from6ddtypenmathcaln10