Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de Aristóteles

The article aims to reflect on the current debate on inequality, seeking to explore ethical issues that are inherent to the topic, mainly the existence of a supposed ideal point for inequality to be reduced. The work is based on the United Nations Sustainabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robson Antonio Grassi
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie 2024-07-01
Series:Revista de Economia Mackenzie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/rem/article/view/17043/12680
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860000239386624
author Robson Antonio Grassi
author_facet Robson Antonio Grassi
author_sort Robson Antonio Grassi
collection DOAJ
description The article aims to reflect on the current debate on inequality, seeking to explore ethical issues that are inherent to the topic, mainly the existence of a supposed ideal point for inequality to be reduced. The work is based on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which, in Raworth’s (2019) proposal, would be the basis, together with the search for environmental sustainability, for reducing poverty and inequality. However, some more developed countries are already at a greater level of progress in terms of these indicators, and even so, in recent decades, there is strong evidence of an increase in inequality and a reduction in important indicators of the well-being of their population. The article then proposes that Aristotle can provide a new look at the growing inequality in today’s world, based on his vision of the “good life”. Seeking to discuss what would be “enough” for the good life proposed by the ancient philosopher today, based on the necessary “basic goods”, as defined by Skidelsky and Skidelsky (2017), we seek to show that such a vision, even though it still requires advancing in analytical terms (such as in the measurement of basic goods), presents clear implications for the current debate on inequality, as it reveals a morally ideal point to seek its reduction, and which can even inspire new discussions on public policy measures.
format Article
id doaj-art-b35fae46e35748b7b967f8fd60781123
institution Kabale University
issn 1678-5002
1808-2785
language Portuguese
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
record_format Article
series Revista de Economia Mackenzie
spelling doaj-art-b35fae46e35748b7b967f8fd607811232025-02-10T18:12:24ZporUniversidade Presbiteriana MackenzieRevista de Economia Mackenzie1678-50021808-27852024-07-0121211314110.5935/1808-2785/rem.v21n2p.113-141Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de AristótelesRobson Antonio Grassi0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3735-3427Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (Ufes)The article aims to reflect on the current debate on inequality, seeking to explore ethical issues that are inherent to the topic, mainly the existence of a supposed ideal point for inequality to be reduced. The work is based on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which, in Raworth’s (2019) proposal, would be the basis, together with the search for environmental sustainability, for reducing poverty and inequality. However, some more developed countries are already at a greater level of progress in terms of these indicators, and even so, in recent decades, there is strong evidence of an increase in inequality and a reduction in important indicators of the well-being of their population. The article then proposes that Aristotle can provide a new look at the growing inequality in today’s world, based on his vision of the “good life”. Seeking to discuss what would be “enough” for the good life proposed by the ancient philosopher today, based on the necessary “basic goods”, as defined by Skidelsky and Skidelsky (2017), we seek to show that such a vision, even though it still requires advancing in analytical terms (such as in the measurement of basic goods), presents clear implications for the current debate on inequality, as it reveals a morally ideal point to seek its reduction, and which can even inspire new discussions on public policy measures.https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/rem/article/view/17043/12680aristotlegood lifeinequalityinsatiabilitysustainable development
spellingShingle Robson Antonio Grassi
Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de Aristóteles
Revista de Economia Mackenzie
aristotle
good life
inequality
insatiability
sustainable development
title Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de Aristóteles
title_full Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de Aristóteles
title_fullStr Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de Aristóteles
title_full_unstemmed Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de Aristóteles
title_short Reduzir a desigualdade, mas até que ponto? Breves comentários a partir da "Vida Boa" de Aristóteles
title_sort reduzir a desigualdade mas ate que ponto breves comentarios a partir da vida boa de aristoteles
topic aristotle
good life
inequality
insatiability
sustainable development
url https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/rem/article/view/17043/12680
work_keys_str_mv AT robsonantoniograssi reduziradesigualdademasatequepontobrevescomentariosapartirdavidaboadearistoteles