Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused over 7 million global deaths. Without vaccines during the first wave, governments implemented nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) such as lockdowns, school closures, and travel restrictions. This study quantifies the impact of NPIs on COVID-19 transmiss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dinis B. Loyens, Constantino Caetano, Carlos Matias-Dias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Heliyon
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024176001
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856765988503552
author Dinis B. Loyens
Constantino Caetano
Carlos Matias-Dias
author_facet Dinis B. Loyens
Constantino Caetano
Carlos Matias-Dias
author_sort Dinis B. Loyens
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused over 7 million global deaths. Without vaccines during the first wave, governments implemented nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) such as lockdowns, school closures, and travel restrictions. This study quantifies the impact of NPIs on COVID-19 transmission in Portugal between 24th February and 1st May. Methods: A compartmental SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious, Removed) model was employed to simulate the first COVID-19 wave in Portugal, using a Bayesian approach and symptom-onset incidence data. The effect of the lockdown, which began on March 22, 2020, on the effective reproductive number, Rt was measured. A counterfactual scenario was created to ascertain the number of cases prevented by the NPIs during the first 15 days after the implementation of NPI. Results: The lockdown reduced overall transmission by 68·6 % (95%Credible Interval (95%CrI): 59·2 %; 77·5 %), almost immediately. This corresponds to a reduction in the effective reproductive number from 2·56 (95%CrI: 2·08; 3·40) to 0·80 (95%CrI: 0·76; 0·84). The counterfactual scenario estimated that the lockdown prevented 118052 (95%CrI: 99464; 145605) cases between 24th February and 6th April. Discussion: The lockdown significantly reduced COVID-19 transmission in Portugal, bringing Rt below 1, meaning each person infected fewer than one individual. While costly, lockdowns effectively control disease spread in the absence of vaccines. Conclusion: Our findings suggest NPIs curbed epidemic transmission, reducing Rt below 1 and easing hospital loads and deaths. This research will help inform future pandemic decision-making and infectious disease modeling worldwide.
format Article
id doaj-art-b3b4c8e3d06746509594598470f69f16
institution Kabale University
issn 2405-8440
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj-art-b3b4c8e3d06746509594598470f69f162025-02-12T05:31:21ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402025-02-01114e41569Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020Dinis B. Loyens0Constantino Caetano1Carlos Matias-Dias2Unidade de Saúde Pública da Amadora, Unidade Local de Saúde Amadora/Sintra, Portugal; Departamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, PortugalDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, PortugalDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, PortugalIntroduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused over 7 million global deaths. Without vaccines during the first wave, governments implemented nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) such as lockdowns, school closures, and travel restrictions. This study quantifies the impact of NPIs on COVID-19 transmission in Portugal between 24th February and 1st May. Methods: A compartmental SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious, Removed) model was employed to simulate the first COVID-19 wave in Portugal, using a Bayesian approach and symptom-onset incidence data. The effect of the lockdown, which began on March 22, 2020, on the effective reproductive number, Rt was measured. A counterfactual scenario was created to ascertain the number of cases prevented by the NPIs during the first 15 days after the implementation of NPI. Results: The lockdown reduced overall transmission by 68·6 % (95%Credible Interval (95%CrI): 59·2 %; 77·5 %), almost immediately. This corresponds to a reduction in the effective reproductive number from 2·56 (95%CrI: 2·08; 3·40) to 0·80 (95%CrI: 0·76; 0·84). The counterfactual scenario estimated that the lockdown prevented 118052 (95%CrI: 99464; 145605) cases between 24th February and 6th April. Discussion: The lockdown significantly reduced COVID-19 transmission in Portugal, bringing Rt below 1, meaning each person infected fewer than one individual. While costly, lockdowns effectively control disease spread in the absence of vaccines. Conclusion: Our findings suggest NPIs curbed epidemic transmission, reducing Rt below 1 and easing hospital loads and deaths. This research will help inform future pandemic decision-making and infectious disease modeling worldwide.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024176001
spellingShingle Dinis B. Loyens
Constantino Caetano
Carlos Matias-Dias
Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020
Heliyon
title Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020
title_full Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020
title_fullStr Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020
title_full_unstemmed Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020
title_short Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on the first wave of COVID-19 in Portugal 2020
title_sort impact of non pharmacological interventions on the first wave of covid 19 in portugal 2020
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024176001
work_keys_str_mv AT dinisbloyens impactofnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonthefirstwaveofcovid19inportugal2020
AT constantinocaetano impactofnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonthefirstwaveofcovid19inportugal2020
AT carlosmatiasdias impactofnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonthefirstwaveofcovid19inportugal2020