Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflections

The relationship between religion and democracy is ambivalent, with religion either able to strengthen democracy or significantly threaten it. With the “digital turn” in religion and the growing prevalence of spiritual tech—such as digital religious platforms, apps specialized on spirituality, and r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Max Tretter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1494894/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860984289165312
author Max Tretter
author_facet Max Tretter
author_sort Max Tretter
collection DOAJ
description The relationship between religion and democracy is ambivalent, with religion either able to strengthen democracy or significantly threaten it. With the “digital turn” in religion and the growing prevalence of spiritual tech—such as digital religious platforms, apps specialized on spirituality, and religious chatbots powered by Artificial Intelligence—this relationship becomes even more intricate. In this Perspective, I will explore the fundamental relationship between religion and democracy and then outline the different ways in which spiritual tech can influence democratic processes. I will demonstrate that there are currently no legitimate national or international measures in place to limit the democracy-threatening potential of spiritual tech. To address this gap, I propose introducing a structured review process designed to actively promote spiritual tech that supports and strengthens democratic values.
format Article
id doaj-art-b585205477bb4a8aa26d8121cdfdd6ad
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-3145
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Political Science
spelling doaj-art-b585205477bb4a8aa26d8121cdfdd6ad2025-02-10T06:48:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452025-02-01710.3389/fpos.2025.14948941494894Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflectionsMax TretterThe relationship between religion and democracy is ambivalent, with religion either able to strengthen democracy or significantly threaten it. With the “digital turn” in religion and the growing prevalence of spiritual tech—such as digital religious platforms, apps specialized on spirituality, and religious chatbots powered by Artificial Intelligence—this relationship becomes even more intricate. In this Perspective, I will explore the fundamental relationship between religion and democracy and then outline the different ways in which spiritual tech can influence democratic processes. I will demonstrate that there are currently no legitimate national or international measures in place to limit the democracy-threatening potential of spiritual tech. To address this gap, I propose introducing a structured review process designed to actively promote spiritual tech that supports and strengthens democratic values.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1494894/fullreligionreligious techtheologyethicsartificial intelligencepolitics
spellingShingle Max Tretter
Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflections
Frontiers in Political Science
religion
religious tech
theology
ethics
artificial intelligence
politics
title Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflections
title_full Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflections
title_fullStr Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflections
title_full_unstemmed Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflections
title_short Spiritual tech and democracy: initial ethical reflections
title_sort spiritual tech and democracy initial ethical reflections
topic religion
religious tech
theology
ethics
artificial intelligence
politics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1494894/full
work_keys_str_mv AT maxtretter spiritualtechanddemocracyinitialethicalreflections