Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation
Abstract Recently, low-cost sensors (LCSs) have been widely used in monitoring particulate matter (PM) mass concentrations. Maintaining the accuracy of the sensors is important and requires rigorous calibration and performance evaluation. In this study, two commercial LCSs, Plantower PMS3003 and Pla...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2023-05-01
|
| Series: | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230097 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823862837134491648 |
|---|---|
| author | Doheon Kim Dongmin Shin Jungho Hwang |
| author_facet | Doheon Kim Dongmin Shin Jungho Hwang |
| author_sort | Doheon Kim |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Recently, low-cost sensors (LCSs) have been widely used in monitoring particulate matter (PM) mass concentrations. Maintaining the accuracy of the sensors is important and requires rigorous calibration and performance evaluation. In this study, two commercial LCSs, Plantower PMS3003 and Plantower PMS7003, were evaluated in the laboratory and in the field using a reference-grade PM monitor (GRIMM 11-D). Laboratory evaluation was conducted with polystyrene latex (PSL) particles in a 1 m3 chamber at 20°C with a relative humidity of 20%. Each LCS indicated higher mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D for small-sized PSL particles (0.56 µm); however, the LCSs indicated lower mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D for PSL particles larger than 0.56 µm. In addition, the difference in mass concentrations between the LCS and GRIMM 11-D became higher with particle sizes greater than 0.56 µm. Nonetheless, a high correlation (R2 > 0.9) between each LCS and GRIMM 11-D was obtained. Field evaluation was conducted at Yonsei University (Seoul, South Korea) from February 12 to March 31, 2022. The LCSs showed generally higher PM mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D; however, some data points of the LCSs revealed different trends. We observed that outdoor PM10/PM2.5 and relative humidity had notable impacts on the LCS data; in addition, LCS sensitivity depended on whether the PM concentration was low or high. Based on these observations, regression-based calibration models were constructed using the selected independent variables (outdoor PM10/PM2.5 and relative humidity) after dividing the PM concentration into low and high sections. Consequently, the accuracy of the LCSs was significantly enhanced. Therefore, using LCSs with the calibration models can replace the use of expensive reference PM monitors, resulting in cost savings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b9715370295f4880bfc559a1ebdcc5f5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1680-8584 2071-1409 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-b9715370295f4880bfc559a1ebdcc5f52025-02-09T12:23:01ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092023-05-0123812110.4209/aaqr.230097Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field EvaluationDoheon Kim0Dongmin Shin1Jungho Hwang2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei UniversityDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei UniversityDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei UniversityAbstract Recently, low-cost sensors (LCSs) have been widely used in monitoring particulate matter (PM) mass concentrations. Maintaining the accuracy of the sensors is important and requires rigorous calibration and performance evaluation. In this study, two commercial LCSs, Plantower PMS3003 and Plantower PMS7003, were evaluated in the laboratory and in the field using a reference-grade PM monitor (GRIMM 11-D). Laboratory evaluation was conducted with polystyrene latex (PSL) particles in a 1 m3 chamber at 20°C with a relative humidity of 20%. Each LCS indicated higher mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D for small-sized PSL particles (0.56 µm); however, the LCSs indicated lower mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D for PSL particles larger than 0.56 µm. In addition, the difference in mass concentrations between the LCS and GRIMM 11-D became higher with particle sizes greater than 0.56 µm. Nonetheless, a high correlation (R2 > 0.9) between each LCS and GRIMM 11-D was obtained. Field evaluation was conducted at Yonsei University (Seoul, South Korea) from February 12 to March 31, 2022. The LCSs showed generally higher PM mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D; however, some data points of the LCSs revealed different trends. We observed that outdoor PM10/PM2.5 and relative humidity had notable impacts on the LCS data; in addition, LCS sensitivity depended on whether the PM concentration was low or high. Based on these observations, regression-based calibration models were constructed using the selected independent variables (outdoor PM10/PM2.5 and relative humidity) after dividing the PM concentration into low and high sections. Consequently, the accuracy of the LCSs was significantly enhanced. Therefore, using LCSs with the calibration models can replace the use of expensive reference PM monitors, resulting in cost savings.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230097Indoor air qualityParticulate matterRegression analysisPM2.5PM10 |
| spellingShingle | Doheon Kim Dongmin Shin Jungho Hwang Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation Aerosol and Air Quality Research Indoor air quality Particulate matter Regression analysis PM2.5 PM10 |
| title | Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation |
| title_full | Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation |
| title_short | Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation |
| title_sort | calibration of low cost sensors for measurement of indoor particulate matter concentrations via laboratory field evaluation |
| topic | Indoor air quality Particulate matter Regression analysis PM2.5 PM10 |
| url | https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230097 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT doheonkim calibrationoflowcostsensorsformeasurementofindoorparticulatematterconcentrationsvialaboratoryfieldevaluation AT dongminshin calibrationoflowcostsensorsformeasurementofindoorparticulatematterconcentrationsvialaboratoryfieldevaluation AT junghohwang calibrationoflowcostsensorsformeasurementofindoorparticulatematterconcentrationsvialaboratoryfieldevaluation |