Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown

Background: The endocrown is described as monobloc ceramic component. The pull-out bond strength acts as a real-life scenario of failure that occurs in endocrown. The different preparation designs have been included to assess the type of preparation that resists the least failure. Aim: To evaluate t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naveen Thangarasu, K. Vijay Venkatesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-07-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860986483834880
author Naveen Thangarasu
K. Vijay Venkatesh
author_facet Naveen Thangarasu
K. Vijay Venkatesh
author_sort Naveen Thangarasu
collection DOAJ
description Background: The endocrown is described as monobloc ceramic component. The pull-out bond strength acts as a real-life scenario of failure that occurs in endocrown. The different preparation designs have been included to assess the type of preparation that resists the least failure. Aim: To evaluate the effect of three different types of preparation designs on the pull-out bond strength (PBS) of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) monolithic endocrowns. Methods and Materials: Thirty extracted mandibular first molars were used for this study. Root canal treatment was done. Samples were divided into three groups of 10 samples each. Group A consists of traditional endocrown preparation with a butt joint preparation. The group B consists of a modified preparation with 50-60 degree inward slope. The group C consists of preparation with a 50-60 degree outward slope. Endocrowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. The endocrowns were adhesively bonded to the respective preparations. Pull-out bond strength was calculated using the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis: The results were statistically evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis. Results: Group B had higher pull-out bond strength compared to the other two types of preparation designs and showed a statistically significant value with a mean significant difference at 0.05 level (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The 50-60 degree inward bevel in endocrown preparation increased the pull-out bond strength in lithium disilicate endocrowns.
format Article
id doaj-art-bbba91056a564e99b33c210a3883a338
institution Kabale University
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
language English
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
spelling doaj-art-bbba91056a564e99b33c210a3883a3382025-02-10T07:17:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032023-07-0134330430710.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of EndocrownNaveen ThangarasuK. Vijay VenkateshBackground: The endocrown is described as monobloc ceramic component. The pull-out bond strength acts as a real-life scenario of failure that occurs in endocrown. The different preparation designs have been included to assess the type of preparation that resists the least failure. Aim: To evaluate the effect of three different types of preparation designs on the pull-out bond strength (PBS) of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) monolithic endocrowns. Methods and Materials: Thirty extracted mandibular first molars were used for this study. Root canal treatment was done. Samples were divided into three groups of 10 samples each. Group A consists of traditional endocrown preparation with a butt joint preparation. The group B consists of a modified preparation with 50-60 degree inward slope. The group C consists of preparation with a 50-60 degree outward slope. Endocrowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. The endocrowns were adhesively bonded to the respective preparations. Pull-out bond strength was calculated using the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis: The results were statistically evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis. Results: Group B had higher pull-out bond strength compared to the other two types of preparation designs and showed a statistically significant value with a mean significant difference at 0.05 level (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The 50-60 degree inward bevel in endocrown preparation increased the pull-out bond strength in lithium disilicate endocrowns.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23bevelcad/camendocrownlithium disilicatepull-out bond strength
spellingShingle Naveen Thangarasu
K. Vijay Venkatesh
Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown
Indian Journal of Dental Research
bevel
cad/cam
endocrown
lithium disilicate
pull-out bond strength
title Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown
title_full Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown
title_fullStr Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown
title_short Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown
title_sort effect of various preparation designs on pull out bond strength of endocrown
topic bevel
cad/cam
endocrown
lithium disilicate
pull-out bond strength
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23
work_keys_str_mv AT naveenthangarasu effectofvariouspreparationdesignsonpulloutbondstrengthofendocrown
AT kvijayvenkatesh effectofvariouspreparationdesignsonpulloutbondstrengthofendocrown