Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown
Background: The endocrown is described as monobloc ceramic component. The pull-out bond strength acts as a real-life scenario of failure that occurs in endocrown. The different preparation designs have been included to assess the type of preparation that resists the least failure. Aim: To evaluate t...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-07-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823860986483834880 |
---|---|
author | Naveen Thangarasu K. Vijay Venkatesh |
author_facet | Naveen Thangarasu K. Vijay Venkatesh |
author_sort | Naveen Thangarasu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background:
The endocrown is described as monobloc ceramic component. The pull-out bond strength acts as a real-life scenario of failure that occurs in endocrown. The different preparation designs have been included to assess the type of preparation that resists the least failure.
Aim:
To evaluate the effect of three different types of preparation designs on the pull-out bond strength (PBS) of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) monolithic endocrowns.
Methods and Materials:
Thirty extracted mandibular first molars were used for this study. Root canal treatment was done. Samples were divided into three groups of 10 samples each. Group A consists of traditional endocrown preparation with a butt joint preparation. The group B consists of a modified preparation with 50-60 degree inward slope. The group C consists of preparation with a 50-60 degree outward slope. Endocrowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. The endocrowns were adhesively bonded to the respective preparations. Pull-out bond strength was calculated using the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.
Statistical Analysis:
The results were statistically evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis.
Results:
Group B had higher pull-out bond strength compared to the other two types of preparation designs and showed a statistically significant value with a mean significant difference at 0.05 level (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
The 50-60 degree inward bevel in endocrown preparation increased the pull-out bond strength in lithium disilicate endocrowns. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-bbba91056a564e99b33c210a3883a338 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
spelling | doaj-art-bbba91056a564e99b33c210a3883a3382025-02-10T07:17:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032023-07-0134330430710.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of EndocrownNaveen ThangarasuK. Vijay VenkateshBackground: The endocrown is described as monobloc ceramic component. The pull-out bond strength acts as a real-life scenario of failure that occurs in endocrown. The different preparation designs have been included to assess the type of preparation that resists the least failure. Aim: To evaluate the effect of three different types of preparation designs on the pull-out bond strength (PBS) of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) monolithic endocrowns. Methods and Materials: Thirty extracted mandibular first molars were used for this study. Root canal treatment was done. Samples were divided into three groups of 10 samples each. Group A consists of traditional endocrown preparation with a butt joint preparation. The group B consists of a modified preparation with 50-60 degree inward slope. The group C consists of preparation with a 50-60 degree outward slope. Endocrowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. The endocrowns were adhesively bonded to the respective preparations. Pull-out bond strength was calculated using the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis: The results were statistically evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis. Results: Group B had higher pull-out bond strength compared to the other two types of preparation designs and showed a statistically significant value with a mean significant difference at 0.05 level (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The 50-60 degree inward bevel in endocrown preparation increased the pull-out bond strength in lithium disilicate endocrowns.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23bevelcad/camendocrownlithium disilicatepull-out bond strength |
spellingShingle | Naveen Thangarasu K. Vijay Venkatesh Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown Indian Journal of Dental Research bevel cad/cam endocrown lithium disilicate pull-out bond strength |
title | Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown |
title_full | Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown |
title_fullStr | Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown |
title_short | Effect of Various Preparation Designs on Pull-Out Bond Strength of Endocrown |
title_sort | effect of various preparation designs on pull out bond strength of endocrown |
topic | bevel cad/cam endocrown lithium disilicate pull-out bond strength |
url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_517_23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naveenthangarasu effectofvariouspreparationdesignsonpulloutbondstrengthofendocrown AT kvijayvenkatesh effectofvariouspreparationdesignsonpulloutbondstrengthofendocrown |