Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review

Objective We evaluated the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) using vaginal specimens in comparison to specimens from the cervix or urine in their ability to detect chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in women based on patient infection status (PIS).Design Systematic review.Data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minttu M Rönn, Louise Mc Grath-Lone, Bethan Davies, Janet D Wilson, Helen Ward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/1/e022510.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825208891196047360
author Minttu M Rönn
Louise Mc Grath-Lone
Bethan Davies
Janet D Wilson
Helen Ward
author_facet Minttu M Rönn
Louise Mc Grath-Lone
Bethan Davies
Janet D Wilson
Helen Ward
author_sort Minttu M Rönn
collection DOAJ
description Objective We evaluated the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) using vaginal specimens in comparison to specimens from the cervix or urine in their ability to detect chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in women based on patient infection status (PIS).Design Systematic review.Data sources EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched through 3 October 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies We included studies that tested samples from the vagina and ≥1 other site (cervix and/or urine) with ≥2 NAATs for chlamydia and ≥2 NAATs or 1 NAAT and culture for gonorrhoea for each site.Data extraction and synthesis Performance is defined as the sensitivity of a NAAT using a specimen site and PIS of the patient. We assessed risk of bias using modified QUADAS-2.Results Nine publications met the inclusion criteria (eight for chlamydia; six for gonorrhoea) and were narratively reviewed. Pooled summary estimates were not calculated due to the variable methodology and PIS definitions. Tests performed on vaginal specimens accomplished similar performance to cervical and urine specimens for chlamydia (range of performance estimates: vaginal 65%–100%, cervical 59%–97%, urine 57%–100%) and gonorrhoea (vaginal 64%–100%, cervical 85%–100%, urine 67%–94%). Vaginal specimens were estimated to have a performance >80% for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections in all but one study.Conclusions Performance of the NAATs for chlamydia and gonorrhoea detection using vaginal specimens was similar to that of cervical and urine specimens relative to PIS. As vaginal samples have a higher acceptability and lower cost, the study can support clinical testing guidelines by providing evidence that vaginal samples are a suitable alternative to traditionally used specimens.
format Article
id doaj-art-c88bc7642be74a88a5839dff61003788
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-c88bc7642be74a88a5839dff610037882025-02-06T17:00:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-01-019110.1136/bmjopen-2018-022510Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic reviewMinttu M Rönn0Louise Mc Grath-Lone1Bethan Davies2Janet D Wilson3Helen Ward41 Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UKUniversity College London Institute of Education, London, UKCardiology, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK3 Leeds Sexual Health, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK1 National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UKObjective We evaluated the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) using vaginal specimens in comparison to specimens from the cervix or urine in their ability to detect chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in women based on patient infection status (PIS).Design Systematic review.Data sources EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched through 3 October 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies We included studies that tested samples from the vagina and ≥1 other site (cervix and/or urine) with ≥2 NAATs for chlamydia and ≥2 NAATs or 1 NAAT and culture for gonorrhoea for each site.Data extraction and synthesis Performance is defined as the sensitivity of a NAAT using a specimen site and PIS of the patient. We assessed risk of bias using modified QUADAS-2.Results Nine publications met the inclusion criteria (eight for chlamydia; six for gonorrhoea) and were narratively reviewed. Pooled summary estimates were not calculated due to the variable methodology and PIS definitions. Tests performed on vaginal specimens accomplished similar performance to cervical and urine specimens for chlamydia (range of performance estimates: vaginal 65%–100%, cervical 59%–97%, urine 57%–100%) and gonorrhoea (vaginal 64%–100%, cervical 85%–100%, urine 67%–94%). Vaginal specimens were estimated to have a performance >80% for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections in all but one study.Conclusions Performance of the NAATs for chlamydia and gonorrhoea detection using vaginal specimens was similar to that of cervical and urine specimens relative to PIS. As vaginal samples have a higher acceptability and lower cost, the study can support clinical testing guidelines by providing evidence that vaginal samples are a suitable alternative to traditionally used specimens.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/1/e022510.full
spellingShingle Minttu M Rönn
Louise Mc Grath-Lone
Bethan Davies
Janet D Wilson
Helen Ward
Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review
BMJ Open
title Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review
title_full Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review
title_fullStr Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review
title_short Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review
title_sort evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests naats in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status a systematic review
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/1/e022510.full
work_keys_str_mv AT minttumronn evaluationoftheperformanceofnucleicacidamplificationtestsnaatsindetectionofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectioninvaginalspecimensrelativetopatientinfectionstatusasystematicreview
AT louisemcgrathlone evaluationoftheperformanceofnucleicacidamplificationtestsnaatsindetectionofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectioninvaginalspecimensrelativetopatientinfectionstatusasystematicreview
AT bethandavies evaluationoftheperformanceofnucleicacidamplificationtestsnaatsindetectionofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectioninvaginalspecimensrelativetopatientinfectionstatusasystematicreview
AT janetdwilson evaluationoftheperformanceofnucleicacidamplificationtestsnaatsindetectionofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectioninvaginalspecimensrelativetopatientinfectionstatusasystematicreview
AT helenward evaluationoftheperformanceofnucleicacidamplificationtestsnaatsindetectionofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectioninvaginalspecimensrelativetopatientinfectionstatusasystematicreview