Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)

This article aims to show that, despite agreeing on some basic issues such as rejecting the dogma of the autonomy of reason and accepting that there is no territory independent of God, Radical Orthodoxy and Reformational Philosophy nonetheless differ. While both philosophy and theology, according t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. Strauss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2015-06-01
Series:Acta Theologica
Online Access:https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2700
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858866513772544
author D. Strauss
author_facet D. Strauss
author_sort D. Strauss
collection DOAJ
description This article aims to show that, despite agreeing on some basic issues such as rejecting the dogma of the autonomy of reason and accepting that there is no territory independent of God, Radical Orthodoxy and Reformational Philosophy nonetheless differ. While both philosophy and theology, according to Radical Orthodoxy, investigate being qua, being only theology has the task to relate being to God. This view still continues the medieval nature?grace split. Alternatively, it is argued that the distinctive feature of scholarly endeavours, namely modal abstraction, may enhance an appreciation of the special scientific nature of theology, without advocating a “static division of human life” into “distinct spheres”.
format Article
id doaj-art-c9bc993a01d74236b14ff3c7a78369af
institution Kabale University
issn 1015-8758
2309-9089
language English
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Theologica
spelling doaj-art-c9bc993a01d74236b14ff3c7a78369af2025-02-11T09:55:15ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Theologica1015-87582309-90892015-06-0135110.38140/at.v35i1.2700Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)D. Strauss0North-West University, South Africa This article aims to show that, despite agreeing on some basic issues such as rejecting the dogma of the autonomy of reason and accepting that there is no territory independent of God, Radical Orthodoxy and Reformational Philosophy nonetheless differ. While both philosophy and theology, according to Radical Orthodoxy, investigate being qua, being only theology has the task to relate being to God. This view still continues the medieval nature?grace split. Alternatively, it is argued that the distinctive feature of scholarly endeavours, namely modal abstraction, may enhance an appreciation of the special scientific nature of theology, without advocating a “static division of human life” into “distinct spheres”. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2700
spellingShingle D. Strauss
Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)
Acta Theologica
title Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)
title_full Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)
title_fullStr Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)
title_full_unstemmed Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)
title_short Theology and philosophy within Radical Orthodoxy (Milbank) and Reformational Philosophy (Dooyeweerd)
title_sort theology and philosophy within radical orthodoxy milbank and reformational philosophy dooyeweerd
url https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2700
work_keys_str_mv AT dstrauss theologyandphilosophywithinradicalorthodoxymilbankandreformationalphilosophydooyeweerd