A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract During the recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, and as a reaction to the worldwide shortage of surgical masks, several countries have introduced new types of masks named “community face coverings” (CoFC). To ensure the quality of such devices and their relevance to slow down the virus spreading,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soleiman Bourrous, Mathieu Barrault, Victor Mocho, Stéphane Poirier, Nathalie Bardin-Monnier, Augustin Charvet, Dominique Thomas, Alexandre Bescond, Axel Fouqueau, Tatiana Mace, François Gaie-Levrel, François-Xavier Ouf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021-02-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200615
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825197537489846272
author Soleiman Bourrous
Mathieu Barrault
Victor Mocho
Stéphane Poirier
Nathalie Bardin-Monnier
Augustin Charvet
Dominique Thomas
Alexandre Bescond
Axel Fouqueau
Tatiana Mace
François Gaie-Levrel
François-Xavier Ouf
author_facet Soleiman Bourrous
Mathieu Barrault
Victor Mocho
Stéphane Poirier
Nathalie Bardin-Monnier
Augustin Charvet
Dominique Thomas
Alexandre Bescond
Axel Fouqueau
Tatiana Mace
François Gaie-Levrel
François-Xavier Ouf
author_sort Soleiman Bourrous
collection DOAJ
description Abstract During the recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, and as a reaction to the worldwide shortage of surgical masks, several countries have introduced new types of masks named “community face coverings” (CoFC). To ensure the quality of such devices and their relevance to slow down the virus spreading, a quick reaction of the certification organisms was necessary to fix the minimal acceptable performances requirements. Moreover, many laboratories involved in the aerosol research field have been asked to perform tests in a quick time according to (CEN, 2020) proposed by the European committee for standardization. This specification imposes a minimal air permeability of 96 L m−2 s−1 for a 100 Pa pressure drop and a minimal filtration efficiency of 70% for 3 µm diameter particles. In the present article, an intercomparison of efficiencies and permeabilities measured by 3 laboratories has been performed. Results are in good agreement considering the heterogeneity of the material samples (within 27% in terms of filtration efficiency and less than 20% in terms of permeability). On this basis, an analysis of 233 materials made of woven, non-woven and mixed fibrous material has been done in terms of filtration efficiency and air permeability. For some of them, measurements have been performed for 0.2 µm, 1 µm and 3 µm particle diameters. As expected, no deterministic correlation could be determined to link these efficiencies to the permeability of the considered samples. However, a trend could be identified for woven and mixed materials with an increase of filtration efficiency when the air permeability decreases. The same exercise has been conducted to link the filtration efficiency measured at 3 µm to the one for lower diameters. Finally, a discussion on the kind of material that is the most relevant to manufacture CoFC supported by spectral filtration efficiency values (from 0.02 µm to 3 µm) is proposed.
format Article
id doaj-art-cbc9c0e3439d4584a2aa80dd3fa4a87b
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-8584
2071-1409
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Aerosol and Air Quality Research
spelling doaj-art-cbc9c0e3439d4584a2aa80dd3fa4a87b2025-02-09T12:19:54ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092021-02-0121611310.4209/aaqr.200615A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 PandemicSoleiman Bourrous0Mathieu Barrault1Victor Mocho2Stéphane Poirier3Nathalie Bardin-Monnier4Augustin Charvet5Dominique Thomas6Alexandre Bescond7Axel Fouqueau8Tatiana Mace9François Gaie-Levrel10François-Xavier Ouf11Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGPUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGPUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGPLaboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAAbstract During the recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, and as a reaction to the worldwide shortage of surgical masks, several countries have introduced new types of masks named “community face coverings” (CoFC). To ensure the quality of such devices and their relevance to slow down the virus spreading, a quick reaction of the certification organisms was necessary to fix the minimal acceptable performances requirements. Moreover, many laboratories involved in the aerosol research field have been asked to perform tests in a quick time according to (CEN, 2020) proposed by the European committee for standardization. This specification imposes a minimal air permeability of 96 L m−2 s−1 for a 100 Pa pressure drop and a minimal filtration efficiency of 70% for 3 µm diameter particles. In the present article, an intercomparison of efficiencies and permeabilities measured by 3 laboratories has been performed. Results are in good agreement considering the heterogeneity of the material samples (within 27% in terms of filtration efficiency and less than 20% in terms of permeability). On this basis, an analysis of 233 materials made of woven, non-woven and mixed fibrous material has been done in terms of filtration efficiency and air permeability. For some of them, measurements have been performed for 0.2 µm, 1 µm and 3 µm particle diameters. As expected, no deterministic correlation could be determined to link these efficiencies to the permeability of the considered samples. However, a trend could be identified for woven and mixed materials with an increase of filtration efficiency when the air permeability decreases. The same exercise has been conducted to link the filtration efficiency measured at 3 µm to the one for lower diameters. Finally, a discussion on the kind of material that is the most relevant to manufacture CoFC supported by spectral filtration efficiency values (from 0.02 µm to 3 µm) is proposed.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200615Respirator maskinter-comparisonFiltration efficiencyFibrous material
spellingShingle Soleiman Bourrous
Mathieu Barrault
Victor Mocho
Stéphane Poirier
Nathalie Bardin-Monnier
Augustin Charvet
Dominique Thomas
Alexandre Bescond
Axel Fouqueau
Tatiana Mace
François Gaie-Levrel
François-Xavier Ouf
A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Respirator mask
inter-comparison
Filtration efficiency
Fibrous material
title A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort performance evaluation and inter laboratory comparison of community face coverings media in the context of covid 19 pandemic
topic Respirator mask
inter-comparison
Filtration efficiency
Fibrous material
url https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200615
work_keys_str_mv AT soleimanbourrous aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT mathieubarrault aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT victormocho aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT stephanepoirier aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT nathaliebardinmonnier aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT augustincharvet aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT dominiquethomas aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT alexandrebescond aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT axelfouqueau aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT tatianamace aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT francoisgaielevrel aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT francoisxavierouf aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT soleimanbourrous performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT mathieubarrault performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT victormocho performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT stephanepoirier performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT nathaliebardinmonnier performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT augustincharvet performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT dominiquethomas performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT alexandrebescond performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT axelfouqueau performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT tatianamace performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT francoisgaielevrel performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic
AT francoisxavierouf performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic