A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract During the recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, and as a reaction to the worldwide shortage of surgical masks, several countries have introduced new types of masks named “community face coverings” (CoFC). To ensure the quality of such devices and their relevance to slow down the virus spreading,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200615 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1825197537489846272 |
---|---|
author | Soleiman Bourrous Mathieu Barrault Victor Mocho Stéphane Poirier Nathalie Bardin-Monnier Augustin Charvet Dominique Thomas Alexandre Bescond Axel Fouqueau Tatiana Mace François Gaie-Levrel François-Xavier Ouf |
author_facet | Soleiman Bourrous Mathieu Barrault Victor Mocho Stéphane Poirier Nathalie Bardin-Monnier Augustin Charvet Dominique Thomas Alexandre Bescond Axel Fouqueau Tatiana Mace François Gaie-Levrel François-Xavier Ouf |
author_sort | Soleiman Bourrous |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract During the recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, and as a reaction to the worldwide shortage of surgical masks, several countries have introduced new types of masks named “community face coverings” (CoFC). To ensure the quality of such devices and their relevance to slow down the virus spreading, a quick reaction of the certification organisms was necessary to fix the minimal acceptable performances requirements. Moreover, many laboratories involved in the aerosol research field have been asked to perform tests in a quick time according to (CEN, 2020) proposed by the European committee for standardization. This specification imposes a minimal air permeability of 96 L m−2 s−1 for a 100 Pa pressure drop and a minimal filtration efficiency of 70% for 3 µm diameter particles. In the present article, an intercomparison of efficiencies and permeabilities measured by 3 laboratories has been performed. Results are in good agreement considering the heterogeneity of the material samples (within 27% in terms of filtration efficiency and less than 20% in terms of permeability). On this basis, an analysis of 233 materials made of woven, non-woven and mixed fibrous material has been done in terms of filtration efficiency and air permeability. For some of them, measurements have been performed for 0.2 µm, 1 µm and 3 µm particle diameters. As expected, no deterministic correlation could be determined to link these efficiencies to the permeability of the considered samples. However, a trend could be identified for woven and mixed materials with an increase of filtration efficiency when the air permeability decreases. The same exercise has been conducted to link the filtration efficiency measured at 3 µm to the one for lower diameters. Finally, a discussion on the kind of material that is the most relevant to manufacture CoFC supported by spectral filtration efficiency values (from 0.02 µm to 3 µm) is proposed. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-cbc9c0e3439d4584a2aa80dd3fa4a87b |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1680-8584 2071-1409 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | Article |
series | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
spelling | doaj-art-cbc9c0e3439d4584a2aa80dd3fa4a87b2025-02-09T12:19:54ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092021-02-0121611310.4209/aaqr.200615A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 PandemicSoleiman Bourrous0Mathieu Barrault1Victor Mocho2Stéphane Poirier3Nathalie Bardin-Monnier4Augustin Charvet5Dominique Thomas6Alexandre Bescond7Axel Fouqueau8Tatiana Mace9François Gaie-Levrel10François-Xavier Ouf11Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGPUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGPUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGPLaboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE)Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCAAbstract During the recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, and as a reaction to the worldwide shortage of surgical masks, several countries have introduced new types of masks named “community face coverings” (CoFC). To ensure the quality of such devices and their relevance to slow down the virus spreading, a quick reaction of the certification organisms was necessary to fix the minimal acceptable performances requirements. Moreover, many laboratories involved in the aerosol research field have been asked to perform tests in a quick time according to (CEN, 2020) proposed by the European committee for standardization. This specification imposes a minimal air permeability of 96 L m−2 s−1 for a 100 Pa pressure drop and a minimal filtration efficiency of 70% for 3 µm diameter particles. In the present article, an intercomparison of efficiencies and permeabilities measured by 3 laboratories has been performed. Results are in good agreement considering the heterogeneity of the material samples (within 27% in terms of filtration efficiency and less than 20% in terms of permeability). On this basis, an analysis of 233 materials made of woven, non-woven and mixed fibrous material has been done in terms of filtration efficiency and air permeability. For some of them, measurements have been performed for 0.2 µm, 1 µm and 3 µm particle diameters. As expected, no deterministic correlation could be determined to link these efficiencies to the permeability of the considered samples. However, a trend could be identified for woven and mixed materials with an increase of filtration efficiency when the air permeability decreases. The same exercise has been conducted to link the filtration efficiency measured at 3 µm to the one for lower diameters. Finally, a discussion on the kind of material that is the most relevant to manufacture CoFC supported by spectral filtration efficiency values (from 0.02 µm to 3 µm) is proposed.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200615Respirator maskinter-comparisonFiltration efficiencyFibrous material |
spellingShingle | Soleiman Bourrous Mathieu Barrault Victor Mocho Stéphane Poirier Nathalie Bardin-Monnier Augustin Charvet Dominique Thomas Alexandre Bescond Axel Fouqueau Tatiana Mace François Gaie-Levrel François-Xavier Ouf A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic Aerosol and Air Quality Research Respirator mask inter-comparison Filtration efficiency Fibrous material |
title | A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | A Performance Evaluation and Inter-laboratory Comparison of Community Face Coverings Media in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | performance evaluation and inter laboratory comparison of community face coverings media in the context of covid 19 pandemic |
topic | Respirator mask inter-comparison Filtration efficiency Fibrous material |
url | https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soleimanbourrous aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT mathieubarrault aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT victormocho aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT stephanepoirier aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT nathaliebardinmonnier aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT augustincharvet aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT dominiquethomas aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT alexandrebescond aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT axelfouqueau aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT tatianamace aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT francoisgaielevrel aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT francoisxavierouf aperformanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT soleimanbourrous performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT mathieubarrault performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT victormocho performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT stephanepoirier performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT nathaliebardinmonnier performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT augustincharvet performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT dominiquethomas performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT alexandrebescond performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT axelfouqueau performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT tatianamace performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT francoisgaielevrel performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic AT francoisxavierouf performanceevaluationandinterlaboratorycomparisonofcommunityfacecoveringsmediainthecontextofcovid19pandemic |