Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition

Weber’s Law states that the ability to recognize the difference in intensity values is proportional to the reference intensity. The law is often generalized to the ratio principle which states that the proportionality also holds above the discrimination threshold. Experimental data showed that Weber...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcin Penconek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1532069/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856535804051456
author Marcin Penconek
author_facet Marcin Penconek
author_sort Marcin Penconek
collection DOAJ
description Weber’s Law states that the ability to recognize the difference in intensity values is proportional to the reference intensity. The law is often generalized to the ratio principle which states that the proportionality also holds above the discrimination threshold. Experimental data showed that Weber’s Law fundamentally held in many sensory modalities including vision, audition, pressure, smell, and taste. However, violations were observed in many experimental studies and showed the mild convex relationship between stimulus intensities and Weber fractions. The magnitude of deviations from Weber’s Law was especially high in the low-intensity range in experiments on light brightness. The mechanistic foundation of Weber’s Law has recently received interest from neuroscience. It was postulated that the law constituted the emergent phenomenon arising in the choice circuit computing categorical choices based on global inhibition. This hypothesis suggested that the neurophysiological basis for Weber’s Law was linked to choice probabilities of a correct decision using linearly encoded stimulus intensities. Previous studies showed that the postulated mechanism led to the emergence of Weber’s Law. Our study showed that the same mechanism could also be responsible for the mild violation of Weber’s Law. The law approximately held for near-threshold discrimination, but did not hold as the ratio principle for easy discrimination with the high probability of a correct response. The revealed violation was qualitatively consistent with the experimental studies which showed the convexity of the relation between stimulus intensities and Weber fractions. However, the mechanism did not explain the magnitude of the deviations from Weber’s Law in the low-intensity range.
format Article
id doaj-art-d4ae33c62a8d4ca488fae2cf8500e4fe
institution Kabale University
issn 1662-453X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj-art-d4ae33c62a8d4ca488fae2cf8500e4fe2025-02-12T07:26:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2025-02-011910.3389/fnins.2025.15320691532069Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibitionMarcin PenconekWeber’s Law states that the ability to recognize the difference in intensity values is proportional to the reference intensity. The law is often generalized to the ratio principle which states that the proportionality also holds above the discrimination threshold. Experimental data showed that Weber’s Law fundamentally held in many sensory modalities including vision, audition, pressure, smell, and taste. However, violations were observed in many experimental studies and showed the mild convex relationship between stimulus intensities and Weber fractions. The magnitude of deviations from Weber’s Law was especially high in the low-intensity range in experiments on light brightness. The mechanistic foundation of Weber’s Law has recently received interest from neuroscience. It was postulated that the law constituted the emergent phenomenon arising in the choice circuit computing categorical choices based on global inhibition. This hypothesis suggested that the neurophysiological basis for Weber’s Law was linked to choice probabilities of a correct decision using linearly encoded stimulus intensities. Previous studies showed that the postulated mechanism led to the emergence of Weber’s Law. Our study showed that the same mechanism could also be responsible for the mild violation of Weber’s Law. The law approximately held for near-threshold discrimination, but did not hold as the ratio principle for easy discrimination with the high probability of a correct response. The revealed violation was qualitatively consistent with the experimental studies which showed the convexity of the relation between stimulus intensities and Weber fractions. However, the mechanism did not explain the magnitude of the deviations from Weber’s Law in the low-intensity range.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1532069/fullWeber’s Lawrecurrent attractor networkchoice circuitglobal inhibitionemergence
spellingShingle Marcin Penconek
Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Weber’s Law
recurrent attractor network
choice circuit
global inhibition
emergence
title Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition
title_full Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition
title_fullStr Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition
title_short Weber’s Law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition
title_sort weber s law as the emergent phenomenon of choices based on global inhibition
topic Weber’s Law
recurrent attractor network
choice circuit
global inhibition
emergence
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1532069/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marcinpenconek weberslawastheemergentphenomenonofchoicesbasedonglobalinhibition