Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power Unit

Abstract China has enacted the ultra-low emission (ULE) transform in coal-fired power plants. Various studies have focused on the model simulation of pollutant emission variations on a national scale, while the specific data for a concrete generation unit was still lacking. We deployed a five-year o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhiyong Li, Zhuangzhuang Ren, Chengjing Cao, Chen Liu, Zhen Zhai, Jixiang Liu, Ziyi Zhan, Changtao Huang, Lan Chen, Hongdan Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2023-07-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230109
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862848817725440
author Zhiyong Li
Zhuangzhuang Ren
Chengjing Cao
Chen Liu
Zhen Zhai
Jixiang Liu
Ziyi Zhan
Changtao Huang
Lan Chen
Hongdan Yuan
author_facet Zhiyong Li
Zhuangzhuang Ren
Chengjing Cao
Chen Liu
Zhen Zhai
Jixiang Liu
Ziyi Zhan
Changtao Huang
Lan Chen
Hongdan Yuan
author_sort Zhiyong Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract China has enacted the ultra-low emission (ULE) transform in coal-fired power plants. Various studies have focused on the model simulation of pollutant emission variations on a national scale, while the specific data for a concrete generation unit was still lacking. We deployed a five-year online data collection campaign in a 660 MW unit to investigate the durative emission reductions of dust, NOx, and SO2, and increases in pollutant removal efficiencies. The result indicated that a time slag appeared between the ULE execution and meeting discharge standards. Since the ULE implementation in late 2014, the pollutant emissions exhibited a decreasing trend, while it was not until 2016 that the emission amounts reached the ULE standards with the actual emissions of 30.7 ± 4.43, 12.3 ± 3.49, and 1.80 ± 0.425 mg m−3 for NOx, SO2, and dust, respectively. It was particularly pointed out that emissions increased again in 2017 though they still met the ULE standards, indicating the comprehensive consideration should be taken between the emission reductions and high cost of the ULE policy. What’s more, the ULE transformation weaken the correlation between pollutant emissions (in mg m−3) and corresponding removal efficiencies of control devices, evidencing the pollutant emissions received complex impacts from coal components, emission control technologies and devices, and so on. More practical emission factors (EFs) expressed in kg h−1 and g MWh−1 relative to the ULE were updated and in this study. Unlike EFs expressed in mg m−3, the most decreases of EFs in kg h−1 and g MWh−1 in 2015 by more than 97.0% compared to 2014 for three air pollutants arisen from reasonable air supply or enhancement in thoroughness of coal combustion.
format Article
id doaj-art-d661d3f2085147dabfffa03fc5f31670
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-8584
2071-1409
language English
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Aerosol and Air Quality Research
spelling doaj-art-d661d3f2085147dabfffa03fc5f316702025-02-09T12:23:02ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092023-07-0123811210.4209/aaqr.230109Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power UnitZhiyong Li0Zhuangzhuang Ren1Chengjing Cao2Chen Liu3Zhen Zhai4Jixiang Liu5Ziyi Zhan6Changtao Huang7Lan Chen8Hongdan Yuan9Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityTianjin Eco-Environmental Monitoring CenterAbstract China has enacted the ultra-low emission (ULE) transform in coal-fired power plants. Various studies have focused on the model simulation of pollutant emission variations on a national scale, while the specific data for a concrete generation unit was still lacking. We deployed a five-year online data collection campaign in a 660 MW unit to investigate the durative emission reductions of dust, NOx, and SO2, and increases in pollutant removal efficiencies. The result indicated that a time slag appeared between the ULE execution and meeting discharge standards. Since the ULE implementation in late 2014, the pollutant emissions exhibited a decreasing trend, while it was not until 2016 that the emission amounts reached the ULE standards with the actual emissions of 30.7 ± 4.43, 12.3 ± 3.49, and 1.80 ± 0.425 mg m−3 for NOx, SO2, and dust, respectively. It was particularly pointed out that emissions increased again in 2017 though they still met the ULE standards, indicating the comprehensive consideration should be taken between the emission reductions and high cost of the ULE policy. What’s more, the ULE transformation weaken the correlation between pollutant emissions (in mg m−3) and corresponding removal efficiencies of control devices, evidencing the pollutant emissions received complex impacts from coal components, emission control technologies and devices, and so on. More practical emission factors (EFs) expressed in kg h−1 and g MWh−1 relative to the ULE were updated and in this study. Unlike EFs expressed in mg m−3, the most decreases of EFs in kg h−1 and g MWh−1 in 2015 by more than 97.0% compared to 2014 for three air pollutants arisen from reasonable air supply or enhancement in thoroughness of coal combustion.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230109Coal-fired power plantUltra-low emission transformationEmission factorNOxSO2
spellingShingle Zhiyong Li
Zhuangzhuang Ren
Chengjing Cao
Chen Liu
Zhen Zhai
Jixiang Liu
Ziyi Zhan
Changtao Huang
Lan Chen
Hongdan Yuan
Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power Unit
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Coal-fired power plant
Ultra-low emission transformation
Emission factor
NOx
SO2
title Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power Unit
title_full Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power Unit
title_fullStr Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power Unit
title_full_unstemmed Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power Unit
title_short Five-year Variations in Air Pollutant Emissions with Ultra-low Emission Retrofits in a 660 MW Coal-fired Power Unit
title_sort five year variations in air pollutant emissions with ultra low emission retrofits in a 660 mw coal fired power unit
topic Coal-fired power plant
Ultra-low emission transformation
Emission factor
NOx
SO2
url https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230109
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiyongli fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT zhuangzhuangren fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT chengjingcao fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT chenliu fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT zhenzhai fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT jixiangliu fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT ziyizhan fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT changtaohuang fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT lanchen fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit
AT hongdanyuan fiveyearvariationsinairpollutantemissionswithultralowemissionretrofitsina660mwcoalfiredpowerunit