Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity
# Background Virtual healthcare has forced clinicians to modify or eliminate parts of the musculoskeletal evaluation such as motion assessment. Although acceptable to excellent levels of in-person goniometric reliability is achievable, reliability of virtual assessments is unknown. # Purpose To d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
North American Sports Medicine Institute
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81065 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825196968756903936 |
|---|---|
| author | Tracy Spigelman Leah Simpkins Casey Humphrey Yehor Vitel Aaron Sciascia |
| author_facet | Tracy Spigelman Leah Simpkins Casey Humphrey Yehor Vitel Aaron Sciascia |
| author_sort | Tracy Spigelman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | # Background
Virtual healthcare has forced clinicians to modify or eliminate parts of the musculoskeletal evaluation such as motion assessment. Although acceptable to excellent levels of in-person goniometric reliability is achievable, reliability of virtual assessments is unknown.
# Purpose
To determine if similar upper extremity goniometric measurements could be obtained in-person and virtually.
# Study Design
Reliability study; classroom setting
# Methods
Publicly recruited sample over 18 years of age with no upper extremity injuries. Each subject was tested in a standing position with dominant arm facing the clinicians to visualize the landmarks for goniometer placement. Flexion and extension of the shoulder, elbow and wrist were measured. Prior to performing in-person goniometric measurements for each joint, an image was captured of each pre-determined joint position using a mobile device with a camera. This image represented the screenshot on a virtual platform. Four clinicians performed in-person measurements twice during the same session on each subject. The following week clinicians measured virtual images using the same techniques. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were determined via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
# Results
Inter-rater reliability for five of the six in-person (ICC≥0.81) and virtual measurements (ICC≥0.78 ) were classified as excellent. In-person wrist extension (ICC=0.60) and virtual wrist flexion (ICC=0.65) were classified as good. Intra-rater reliability for individual clinicians were between good and excellent for the in-person measurements (ICC:0.61-0.96) and virtual measurements (ICC:0.72-0.97). There were a greater number of excellent ICC values for the virtual measurements (90%) compared to in-person measurements (70%). There were statistically significant differences between in-person and virtual sessions for five of six measurements (p≤0.006). Only elbow extension did not differ between sessions (p=0.966).
# Conclusion
Virtual assessment compared to goniometric measurements showed good to excellent inter- and intra-rater reliabilities (ICC \> 0.60), which suggests clinicians can utilize goniometry either in person or on a virtual platform.
# Level of Evidence
3b |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d8c3b5d83a09443d9dd92401f7db26e0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2159-2896 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | North American Sports Medicine Institute |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| spelling | doaj-art-d8c3b5d83a09443d9dd92401f7db26e02025-02-11T20:29:55ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962023-08-01184Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper ExtremityTracy SpigelmanLeah SimpkinsCasey HumphreyYehor VitelAaron Sciascia# Background Virtual healthcare has forced clinicians to modify or eliminate parts of the musculoskeletal evaluation such as motion assessment. Although acceptable to excellent levels of in-person goniometric reliability is achievable, reliability of virtual assessments is unknown. # Purpose To determine if similar upper extremity goniometric measurements could be obtained in-person and virtually. # Study Design Reliability study; classroom setting # Methods Publicly recruited sample over 18 years of age with no upper extremity injuries. Each subject was tested in a standing position with dominant arm facing the clinicians to visualize the landmarks for goniometer placement. Flexion and extension of the shoulder, elbow and wrist were measured. Prior to performing in-person goniometric measurements for each joint, an image was captured of each pre-determined joint position using a mobile device with a camera. This image represented the screenshot on a virtual platform. Four clinicians performed in-person measurements twice during the same session on each subject. The following week clinicians measured virtual images using the same techniques. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were determined via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). # Results Inter-rater reliability for five of the six in-person (ICC≥0.81) and virtual measurements (ICC≥0.78 ) were classified as excellent. In-person wrist extension (ICC=0.60) and virtual wrist flexion (ICC=0.65) were classified as good. Intra-rater reliability for individual clinicians were between good and excellent for the in-person measurements (ICC:0.61-0.96) and virtual measurements (ICC:0.72-0.97). There were a greater number of excellent ICC values for the virtual measurements (90%) compared to in-person measurements (70%). There were statistically significant differences between in-person and virtual sessions for five of six measurements (p≤0.006). Only elbow extension did not differ between sessions (p=0.966). # Conclusion Virtual assessment compared to goniometric measurements showed good to excellent inter- and intra-rater reliabilities (ICC \> 0.60), which suggests clinicians can utilize goniometry either in person or on a virtual platform. # Level of Evidence 3bhttps://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81065 |
| spellingShingle | Tracy Spigelman Leah Simpkins Casey Humphrey Yehor Vitel Aaron Sciascia Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| title | Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity |
| title_full | Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity |
| title_fullStr | Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity |
| title_short | Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity |
| title_sort | reliability analysis of in person and virtual goniometric measurements of the upper extremity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81065 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tracyspigelman reliabilityanalysisofinpersonandvirtualgoniometricmeasurementsoftheupperextremity AT leahsimpkins reliabilityanalysisofinpersonandvirtualgoniometricmeasurementsoftheupperextremity AT caseyhumphrey reliabilityanalysisofinpersonandvirtualgoniometricmeasurementsoftheupperextremity AT yehorvitel reliabilityanalysisofinpersonandvirtualgoniometricmeasurementsoftheupperextremity AT aaronsciascia reliabilityanalysisofinpersonandvirtualgoniometricmeasurementsoftheupperextremity |