Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.

<h4>Introduction</h4>This study aims to assess the cost effectiveness of romosozumab versus teriparatide, both sequenced to denosumab, for the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fractures in Mexican women.<h4>Methods</h4>A Markov model was us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Pablo Diaz Martinez, Therese Aubry de Maraumont, Elly Natty Sánchez, Luis Miguel Camacho Cordero, Eric Yeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299673
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856862544527360
author Juan Pablo Diaz Martinez
Therese Aubry de Maraumont
Elly Natty Sánchez
Luis Miguel Camacho Cordero
Eric Yeh
author_facet Juan Pablo Diaz Martinez
Therese Aubry de Maraumont
Elly Natty Sánchez
Luis Miguel Camacho Cordero
Eric Yeh
author_sort Juan Pablo Diaz Martinez
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>This study aims to assess the cost effectiveness of romosozumab versus teriparatide, both sequenced to denosumab, for the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fractures in Mexican women.<h4>Methods</h4>A Markov model was used to assess the relative cost effectiveness of 1 year of romosozumab versus 2 years of teriparatide, both sequenced to denosumab for a total treatment duration of 5 years. Outcomes for a cohort of women with a mean age of 74 years, a T-score ≤-2.5 and a previous fragility fracture were simulated over a lifetime horizon. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Mexican healthcare system and used a discount rate of 5% per annum. To inform relative fracture incidence, the bone mineral density (BMD) advantage of romosozumab over teriparatide was translated into relative risks of fracture, using relationships provided by a meta-regression of osteoporosis therapy trials. Outcomes were assessed in terms of lifetime costs (2023 Mexican pesos), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years gained (LYs).<h4>Results</h4>Base case results showed that, compared with teriparatide/ denosumab, romosozumab/ denosumab reduced costs by $51,363 MXN per patient and yielded 0.03 additional QALYs and 0.01 LYs. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed that results are robust to uncertainty in model assumptions and inputs.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Results show that romosozumab/ denosumab produces greater health benefits at a lower total cost than teriparatide/ denosumab.
format Article
id doaj-art-dab8c7fb3f3a420eb7ffad8c349639ae
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-dab8c7fb3f3a420eb7ffad8c349639ae2025-02-12T05:31:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01202e029967310.1371/journal.pone.0299673Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.Juan Pablo Diaz MartinezTherese Aubry de MaraumontElly Natty SánchezLuis Miguel Camacho CorderoEric Yeh<h4>Introduction</h4>This study aims to assess the cost effectiveness of romosozumab versus teriparatide, both sequenced to denosumab, for the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fractures in Mexican women.<h4>Methods</h4>A Markov model was used to assess the relative cost effectiveness of 1 year of romosozumab versus 2 years of teriparatide, both sequenced to denosumab for a total treatment duration of 5 years. Outcomes for a cohort of women with a mean age of 74 years, a T-score ≤-2.5 and a previous fragility fracture were simulated over a lifetime horizon. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Mexican healthcare system and used a discount rate of 5% per annum. To inform relative fracture incidence, the bone mineral density (BMD) advantage of romosozumab over teriparatide was translated into relative risks of fracture, using relationships provided by a meta-regression of osteoporosis therapy trials. Outcomes were assessed in terms of lifetime costs (2023 Mexican pesos), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years gained (LYs).<h4>Results</h4>Base case results showed that, compared with teriparatide/ denosumab, romosozumab/ denosumab reduced costs by $51,363 MXN per patient and yielded 0.03 additional QALYs and 0.01 LYs. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed that results are robust to uncertainty in model assumptions and inputs.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Results show that romosozumab/ denosumab produces greater health benefits at a lower total cost than teriparatide/ denosumab.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299673
spellingShingle Juan Pablo Diaz Martinez
Therese Aubry de Maraumont
Elly Natty Sánchez
Luis Miguel Camacho Cordero
Eric Yeh
Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.
PLoS ONE
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in Mexico.
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of romosozumab for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture in mexico
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299673
work_keys_str_mv AT juanpablodiazmartinez costeffectivenessanalysisofromosozumabforseverepostmenopausalosteoporosisatveryhighriskoffractureinmexico
AT thereseaubrydemaraumont costeffectivenessanalysisofromosozumabforseverepostmenopausalosteoporosisatveryhighriskoffractureinmexico
AT ellynattysanchez costeffectivenessanalysisofromosozumabforseverepostmenopausalosteoporosisatveryhighriskoffractureinmexico
AT luismiguelcamachocordero costeffectivenessanalysisofromosozumabforseverepostmenopausalosteoporosisatveryhighriskoffractureinmexico
AT ericyeh costeffectivenessanalysisofromosozumabforseverepostmenopausalosteoporosisatveryhighriskoffractureinmexico