Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures

Abstract Background With robotic advancements in UKA technology, we sought to explore if robotic-assisted UKA could translate to clinical benefits such as reduced hospital stays and lowered emergency readmissions. Also, current utilization trends of UKA and choice of procedure timing (unilateral [uU...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelvin S. C. Cheung, Kai Chun Augustine Chan, Amy Cheung, Ping Keung Chan, Michelle Hilda Luk, Kwong Yuen Chiu, Henry Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:Arthroplasty
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00289-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823863312172974080
author Kelvin S. C. Cheung
Kai Chun Augustine Chan
Amy Cheung
Ping Keung Chan
Michelle Hilda Luk
Kwong Yuen Chiu
Henry Fu
author_facet Kelvin S. C. Cheung
Kai Chun Augustine Chan
Amy Cheung
Ping Keung Chan
Michelle Hilda Luk
Kwong Yuen Chiu
Henry Fu
author_sort Kelvin S. C. Cheung
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background With robotic advancements in UKA technology, we sought to explore if robotic-assisted UKA could translate to clinical benefits such as reduced hospital stays and lowered emergency readmissions. Also, current utilization trends of UKA and choice of procedure timing (unilateral [uUKA] vs. one-staged bilateral UKA [biUKA]) could be explored. Methods This was a retrospective study utilizing the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) for data retrieval. All patients who had undergone primary UKA in all Hospital Authority (HA) hospitals in HK from 2021–2023 were included. Primary outcomes included utilization of UKA compared to TKA and percentage utilization of different UKA systems, namely, conventional, Mako, and Cori/Navio systems, from 2021–2023. Secondary outcomes involved: (1) patient demographics, (2) postoperative average length of stay (ALOS), (3) 30-day and 90-day postoperative Accident and Emergency Department (AED) attendance, (4) surgical times (skin-to-skin) and (5) 90-day mortality and reoperation. Differences in outcomes between uUKA and biUKA and between different robotic systems were examined. Regression analysis was performed to study if utilization of robotic-assisted systems could contribute to reduced hospital stays. Results UKA accounted for 15.2% of primary knee arthroplasties throughout 2021–2023. Robotic-assisted UKA (Mako and Navio/Cori) has shown an increasing utilization since 2022 in both unilateral (16.0% to 25.9%) and bilateral operations (17.8% to 29.0%). Mako had shorter ALOS than Navio/Cori (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.006) and significantly shorter ALOS than conventional UKA (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.004). Utilization of Mako was predictive of shortened ALOS on multi-linear regression (β = − 0.056; P = 0.049). Interestingly, biUKAs, especially conventional ones, showed a lower attendance rate than uUKAs at 30-day (2.9% VS 6.9%; P = 0.036) and 90-days (7.8% VS 15.7%; P = 0.004). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a prolonged surgical time of 16.4 min in uUKA and 29.1 min in biUKA compared to conventional operations. Conclusion UKA utilization has dropped since 2021 but the percentage of robotic-assisted UKA has risen. Mako yielded promising results in reducing hospital stays compared to conventional operations. Sub-group analysis (Mako versus Cori/Navio) highlighted the importance of distinguishing between different robotic platforms. For patients with bilateral unicompartmental OA, biUKA was shown to be a safe and effective alternative to unilateral operations. Trial Registration Registered (HKU/ HA HKW IRB; Ref No: 24–373).
format Article
id doaj-art-de212bd42cc549b999f44f13de5cfaaf
institution Kabale University
issn 2524-7948
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty
spelling doaj-art-de212bd42cc549b999f44f13de5cfaaf2025-02-09T12:12:23ZengBMCArthroplasty2524-79482025-02-017111210.1186/s42836-024-00289-5Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of proceduresKelvin S. C. Cheung0Kai Chun Augustine Chan1Amy Cheung2Ping Keung Chan3Michelle Hilda Luk4Kwong Yuen Chiu5Henry Fu6Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong KongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong KongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong KongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hong Kong Sanatorium HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong KongAbstract Background With robotic advancements in UKA technology, we sought to explore if robotic-assisted UKA could translate to clinical benefits such as reduced hospital stays and lowered emergency readmissions. Also, current utilization trends of UKA and choice of procedure timing (unilateral [uUKA] vs. one-staged bilateral UKA [biUKA]) could be explored. Methods This was a retrospective study utilizing the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) for data retrieval. All patients who had undergone primary UKA in all Hospital Authority (HA) hospitals in HK from 2021–2023 were included. Primary outcomes included utilization of UKA compared to TKA and percentage utilization of different UKA systems, namely, conventional, Mako, and Cori/Navio systems, from 2021–2023. Secondary outcomes involved: (1) patient demographics, (2) postoperative average length of stay (ALOS), (3) 30-day and 90-day postoperative Accident and Emergency Department (AED) attendance, (4) surgical times (skin-to-skin) and (5) 90-day mortality and reoperation. Differences in outcomes between uUKA and biUKA and between different robotic systems were examined. Regression analysis was performed to study if utilization of robotic-assisted systems could contribute to reduced hospital stays. Results UKA accounted for 15.2% of primary knee arthroplasties throughout 2021–2023. Robotic-assisted UKA (Mako and Navio/Cori) has shown an increasing utilization since 2022 in both unilateral (16.0% to 25.9%) and bilateral operations (17.8% to 29.0%). Mako had shorter ALOS than Navio/Cori (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.006) and significantly shorter ALOS than conventional UKA (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.004). Utilization of Mako was predictive of shortened ALOS on multi-linear regression (β = − 0.056; P = 0.049). Interestingly, biUKAs, especially conventional ones, showed a lower attendance rate than uUKAs at 30-day (2.9% VS 6.9%; P = 0.036) and 90-days (7.8% VS 15.7%; P = 0.004). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a prolonged surgical time of 16.4 min in uUKA and 29.1 min in biUKA compared to conventional operations. Conclusion UKA utilization has dropped since 2021 but the percentage of robotic-assisted UKA has risen. Mako yielded promising results in reducing hospital stays compared to conventional operations. Sub-group analysis (Mako versus Cori/Navio) highlighted the importance of distinguishing between different robotic platforms. For patients with bilateral unicompartmental OA, biUKA was shown to be a safe and effective alternative to unilateral operations. Trial Registration Registered (HKU/ HA HKW IRB; Ref No: 24–373).https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00289-5Robotic surgeryUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyMakoNavioKnee surgeryOsteoarthritis
spellingShingle Kelvin S. C. Cheung
Kai Chun Augustine Chan
Amy Cheung
Ping Keung Chan
Michelle Hilda Luk
Kwong Yuen Chiu
Henry Fu
Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures
Arthroplasty
Robotic surgery
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Mako
Navio
Knee surgery
Osteoarthritis
title Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures
title_full Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures
title_fullStr Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures
title_full_unstemmed Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures
title_short Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures
title_sort current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty uka choosing between robotic assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures
topic Robotic surgery
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Mako
Navio
Knee surgery
Osteoarthritis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00289-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kelvinsccheung currenttrendsofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyukachoosingbetweenroboticassistedandconventionalsurgeriesandtimingofprocedures
AT kaichunaugustinechan currenttrendsofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyukachoosingbetweenroboticassistedandconventionalsurgeriesandtimingofprocedures
AT amycheung currenttrendsofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyukachoosingbetweenroboticassistedandconventionalsurgeriesandtimingofprocedures
AT pingkeungchan currenttrendsofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyukachoosingbetweenroboticassistedandconventionalsurgeriesandtimingofprocedures
AT michellehildaluk currenttrendsofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyukachoosingbetweenroboticassistedandconventionalsurgeriesandtimingofprocedures
AT kwongyuenchiu currenttrendsofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyukachoosingbetweenroboticassistedandconventionalsurgeriesandtimingofprocedures
AT henryfu currenttrendsofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyukachoosingbetweenroboticassistedandconventionalsurgeriesandtimingofprocedures