A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management

Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of soft tissue injury management by emergency nurse practitioners (ENPs) and extended scope physiotherapists (ESPs) compared to the routine care provided by doctors in a UK emergency department (ED).Design Randomised, pragmatic trial of equivalence.S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Richard Benger, Jane Powell, Fiona Cramp, Carey Middleton McClellan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2012-11-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001092.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823857165489668096
author Jonathan Richard Benger
Jane Powell
Fiona Cramp
Carey Middleton McClellan
author_facet Jonathan Richard Benger
Jane Powell
Fiona Cramp
Carey Middleton McClellan
author_sort Jonathan Richard Benger
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of soft tissue injury management by emergency nurse practitioners (ENPs) and extended scope physiotherapists (ESPs) compared to the routine care provided by doctors in a UK emergency department (ED).Design Randomised, pragmatic trial of equivalence.Setting One adult ED in England.Participants 372 patients were randomised; 126 to the ESP group, 123 to the ENP group and 123 to the doctor group. Participants were adults (older than 16 years) presenting to the ED with a peripheral soft tissue injury eligible for management by any of the three professional groups. Patients were excluded if they had any of the following: injury greater than 72 hours old; systemic disease; dislocated joints; recent surgery; unable to give informed consent (eg, dementia), open wounds; major deformities; opiate analgesia required; concurrent chest/rib injury; neurovascular deficits and associated fracture.Interventions Patients were randomised to treatment by ESPs, ENPs or routine care provided by doctors (of all grades).Main outcome measures Upper-limb and lower-limb functional scores, quality of life, physical well-being, preference-based health measures and the number of days off work.Results The clinical outcomes of soft tissue injury treated by ESPs and ENPs in the ED were equivalent to routine care provided by doctors.Conclusions As all groups were clinically equivalent it is other factors such as cost, workforce sustainability, service provision and skill mix that become important. This result validates the role of the ENP, which is becoming established as an integral part of minor injuries care, and demonstrates that the ESP should be considered as part of the clinical skill mix without detriment to outcomes.ISRCTN-ISRCTN trials register number 70891354.
format Article
id doaj-art-de33fbfb9b1447afa7929284433b83a2
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-de33fbfb9b1447afa7929284433b83a22025-02-11T23:40:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552012-11-012610.1136/bmjopen-2012-001092A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury managementJonathan Richard Benger0Jane Powell1Fiona Cramp2Carey Middleton McClellan32 Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UKSomerset NHS Foundation Trust, Musgrove Park Hospital, Parkfield Drive, Taunton, SOM TA1 5DA, UK1 School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK1Academic Department of Emergency Care, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UKObjectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of soft tissue injury management by emergency nurse practitioners (ENPs) and extended scope physiotherapists (ESPs) compared to the routine care provided by doctors in a UK emergency department (ED).Design Randomised, pragmatic trial of equivalence.Setting One adult ED in England.Participants 372 patients were randomised; 126 to the ESP group, 123 to the ENP group and 123 to the doctor group. Participants were adults (older than 16 years) presenting to the ED with a peripheral soft tissue injury eligible for management by any of the three professional groups. Patients were excluded if they had any of the following: injury greater than 72 hours old; systemic disease; dislocated joints; recent surgery; unable to give informed consent (eg, dementia), open wounds; major deformities; opiate analgesia required; concurrent chest/rib injury; neurovascular deficits and associated fracture.Interventions Patients were randomised to treatment by ESPs, ENPs or routine care provided by doctors (of all grades).Main outcome measures Upper-limb and lower-limb functional scores, quality of life, physical well-being, preference-based health measures and the number of days off work.Results The clinical outcomes of soft tissue injury treated by ESPs and ENPs in the ED were equivalent to routine care provided by doctors.Conclusions As all groups were clinically equivalent it is other factors such as cost, workforce sustainability, service provision and skill mix that become important. This result validates the role of the ENP, which is becoming established as an integral part of minor injuries care, and demonstrates that the ESP should be considered as part of the clinical skill mix without detriment to outcomes.ISRCTN-ISRCTN trials register number 70891354.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001092.full
spellingShingle Jonathan Richard Benger
Jane Powell
Fiona Cramp
Carey Middleton McClellan
A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management
BMJ Open
title A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management
title_full A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management
title_fullStr A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management
title_full_unstemmed A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management
title_short A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management
title_sort randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001092.full
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanrichardbenger arandomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement
AT janepowell arandomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement
AT fionacramp arandomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement
AT careymiddletonmcclellan arandomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement
AT jonathanrichardbenger randomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement
AT janepowell randomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement
AT fionacramp randomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement
AT careymiddletonmcclellan randomisedtrialcomparingtheclinicaleffectivenessofdifferentemergencydepartmenthealthcareprofessionalsinsofttissueinjurymanagement