Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/Fs

Abstract In this study, the atmospheric total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ concentrations, gas-particle partitioning, PM2.5 concentration, PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content and dry deposition flux in Shanghai and Nanjing were investigated from 2018–2020. In Shanghai, the total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fanxuan Yu, Kangping Cui, Hwey-Lin Sheu, Yen-Kung Hsieh, Xueying Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021-04-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210059
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825197544458682368
author Fanxuan Yu
Kangping Cui
Hwey-Lin Sheu
Yen-Kung Hsieh
Xueying Tian
author_facet Fanxuan Yu
Kangping Cui
Hwey-Lin Sheu
Yen-Kung Hsieh
Xueying Tian
author_sort Fanxuan Yu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this study, the atmospheric total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ concentrations, gas-particle partitioning, PM2.5 concentration, PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content and dry deposition flux in Shanghai and Nanjing were investigated from 2018–2020. In Shanghai, the total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ concentration dropped from 0.0291 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3 from 2018–2019 to 0.0250 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3 in 2020, while in Nanjing, it dropped from 0.0423 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3 to 0.0338 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3. The average concentrations of PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in spring and winter in Shanghai and Nanjing were 47.6% and 53.8% higher than those in summer, respectively. From 2018–2019, the average particle phase fractions of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in Shanghai and Nanjing were 50.3% and 57.5%, respectively, while in 2020, they were 47.8% and 55.1%, respectively. From 2018–2019, the average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content was 0.342 and 0.493 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1 in Shanghai and Nanjing, respectively, while in 2020, it was 0.312 and 0.489 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1, respectively. In Shanghai and Nanjing, the average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content in spring and winter was 77.5% and 73.2% higher than that in summer, respectively. From 2018–2019, the dry deposition flux of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ was 316.3 and 460.5 pg WHO2005-TEQ m−2 month−1 in Shanghai and Nanjing, respectively, while in 2020, it was 272.5 and 368.4 pg WHO2005-TEQ m−2 month−1, respectively. The average dry deposition flux of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in spring and winter was 47.6% and 53.8% higher than that summer in Shanghai and Nanjing, respectively. The above results indicate that COVID-19 in 2020 had a positive effect on air quality improvement in PCDD/Fs. On average, more than 98.88% of the total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ dry deposition flux was primarily contributed by the particle phase. This was attributed to the fact that dry deposition of particle phase PCDD/Fs was mainly due to gravitational settling accompanied by higher dry deposition velocities, while the gas phase PCDD/Fs were deposited mostly by diffusion at a lower dry deposition velocity.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1140a300ead471897b4eb09fcb2e69c
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-8584
2071-1409
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Aerosol and Air Quality Research
spelling doaj-art-e1140a300ead471897b4eb09fcb2e69c2025-02-09T12:20:52ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092021-04-0121511810.4209/aaqr.210059Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/FsFanxuan Yu0Kangping Cui1Hwey-Lin Sheu2Yen-Kung Hsieh3Xueying Tian4School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologySchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologyDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kun Shan UniversityMarine Ecology and Conservation Research Center, National Academy of Marine ResearchSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologyAbstract In this study, the atmospheric total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ concentrations, gas-particle partitioning, PM2.5 concentration, PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content and dry deposition flux in Shanghai and Nanjing were investigated from 2018–2020. In Shanghai, the total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ concentration dropped from 0.0291 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3 from 2018–2019 to 0.0250 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3 in 2020, while in Nanjing, it dropped from 0.0423 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3 to 0.0338 pg-WHO2005-TEQ m−3. The average concentrations of PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in spring and winter in Shanghai and Nanjing were 47.6% and 53.8% higher than those in summer, respectively. From 2018–2019, the average particle phase fractions of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in Shanghai and Nanjing were 50.3% and 57.5%, respectively, while in 2020, they were 47.8% and 55.1%, respectively. From 2018–2019, the average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content was 0.342 and 0.493 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1 in Shanghai and Nanjing, respectively, while in 2020, it was 0.312 and 0.489 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1, respectively. In Shanghai and Nanjing, the average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content in spring and winter was 77.5% and 73.2% higher than that in summer, respectively. From 2018–2019, the dry deposition flux of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ was 316.3 and 460.5 pg WHO2005-TEQ m−2 month−1 in Shanghai and Nanjing, respectively, while in 2020, it was 272.5 and 368.4 pg WHO2005-TEQ m−2 month−1, respectively. The average dry deposition flux of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in spring and winter was 47.6% and 53.8% higher than that summer in Shanghai and Nanjing, respectively. The above results indicate that COVID-19 in 2020 had a positive effect on air quality improvement in PCDD/Fs. On average, more than 98.88% of the total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ dry deposition flux was primarily contributed by the particle phase. This was attributed to the fact that dry deposition of particle phase PCDD/Fs was mainly due to gravitational settling accompanied by higher dry deposition velocities, while the gas phase PCDD/Fs were deposited mostly by diffusion at a lower dry deposition velocity.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210059PCDD/FsPM2.5Particle-boundPhase distributionDry deposition
spellingShingle Fanxuan Yu
Kangping Cui
Hwey-Lin Sheu
Yen-Kung Hsieh
Xueying Tian
Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/Fs
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
PCDD/Fs
PM2.5
Particle-bound
Phase distribution
Dry deposition
title Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/Fs
title_full Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/Fs
title_fullStr Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/Fs
title_full_unstemmed Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/Fs
title_short Atmospheric Concentration, Particle-bound Content, and Dry Deposition of PCDD/Fs
title_sort atmospheric concentration particle bound content and dry deposition of pcdd fs
topic PCDD/Fs
PM2.5
Particle-bound
Phase distribution
Dry deposition
url https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210059
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxuanyu atmosphericconcentrationparticleboundcontentanddrydepositionofpcddfs
AT kangpingcui atmosphericconcentrationparticleboundcontentanddrydepositionofpcddfs
AT hweylinsheu atmosphericconcentrationparticleboundcontentanddrydepositionofpcddfs
AT yenkunghsieh atmosphericconcentrationparticleboundcontentanddrydepositionofpcddfs
AT xueyingtian atmosphericconcentrationparticleboundcontentanddrydepositionofpcddfs