Mitral Valve Repair

Background: Despite strong recommendations from multiple societies to pursue durable mitral valve repair (MVr), repair rates and outcomes remain inconsistent across the world. This is partly due to limited surgeon and center experience and lack of centralization of care for this technically challeng...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irbaz Hameed, MD, Adham Ahmed, BS, Christina Waldron, BS, Percy T. Algarate, MD, Michal Kawczynski, MD, Maurish Fatima, MBBS, BS, Amnah Alhazmi, MBBS, Samantha Colon, BS, Alexandria Brackett, MA, MLIS, Samuel Heuts, MD, PhD, Peyman Sardari Nia, MD, PhD, Mario Gaudino, MD, PhD, Vinay Badhwar, MD, Arnar Geirsson, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:JACC: Advances
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25000067
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859432717549568
author Irbaz Hameed, MD
Adham Ahmed, BS
Christina Waldron, BS
Percy T. Algarate, MD
Michal Kawczynski, MD
Maurish Fatima, MBBS, BS
Amnah Alhazmi, MBBS
Samantha Colon, BS
Alexandria Brackett, MA, MLIS
Samuel Heuts, MD, PhD
Peyman Sardari Nia, MD, PhD
Mario Gaudino, MD, PhD
Vinay Badhwar, MD
Arnar Geirsson, MD
author_facet Irbaz Hameed, MD
Adham Ahmed, BS
Christina Waldron, BS
Percy T. Algarate, MD
Michal Kawczynski, MD
Maurish Fatima, MBBS, BS
Amnah Alhazmi, MBBS
Samantha Colon, BS
Alexandria Brackett, MA, MLIS
Samuel Heuts, MD, PhD
Peyman Sardari Nia, MD, PhD
Mario Gaudino, MD, PhD
Vinay Badhwar, MD
Arnar Geirsson, MD
author_sort Irbaz Hameed, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Despite strong recommendations from multiple societies to pursue durable mitral valve repair (MVr), repair rates and outcomes remain inconsistent across the world. This is partly due to limited surgeon and center experience and lack of centralization of care for this technically challenging operation. Objectives: The authors evaluate the association between annual case volume and contemporary long-term outcomes of patients undergoing isolated MVr. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify contemporary studies on isolated MVr in adults from January 2013 to November 2023. The primary outcomes were long-term survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation (moderate-severe). A novel meta-analytic volume-outcome approach using reconstructed Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data from the original studies was used. A frailty Cox model was applied to study volume-outcome relationships. Studies were pooled for each reported outcome and divided into 3 tertiles (T1-3) based on the annual case volume and number of patients of each center. Results: A total of 14,070 patients from 60 studies were pooled. Sixteen studies (6,099 patients) reported long-term survival. The overall pooled 10-year survival was 70.8% (95% CI: 68.9%-72.8%). Compared to lower volume centers, centers performing >38 cases/y were associated with significantly improved long-term survival (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.36-0.49; P < 0.001). For degenerative mitral valve disease, a volume cutoff of >45 cases/y was associated with significantly improved long-term survival (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.32-0.49; P < 0.001). Twelve studies (4,230 patients) reported long-term freedom from reoperation and 10 studies (2,470 patients) reported Kaplan-Meier-derived long-term freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation data, respectively. The overall pooled 10-year freedom from reoperation was 90.2% (95% CI: 88.1%-92.4%), while the overall pooled 10-year freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation was 72.7% (95% CI: 68.9%-76.8%). Centers performing >45 cases/y (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.84; P = 0.003) and >70 cases/y (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.42-0.98; P = 0.042) were associated with significantly improved long-term freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation and freedom from reoperation, respectively. For degenerative mitral disease, >45 cases/y was associated with significantly improved freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.36-0.72; P < 0.001); the volume outcome association for freedom from reoperation was not statistically significant (P = 0.58). Conclusions: Our study validates volume cutoffs associated with optimal long-term outcomes following isolated MVr. We found MVr volumes of >38 cases/y, 45 cases/y, and >70 cases/y to be associated with significantly improved long-term survival, durability of repair, and freedom from reoperation, respectively. These findings may define experienced centers and surgeons for patients requiring MVr for primary/degenerative mitral valve disease.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2f5d2df34894eb088564c1398573e4e
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-963X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JACC: Advances
spelling doaj-art-e2f5d2df34894eb088564c1398573e4e2025-02-11T04:35:43ZengElsevierJACC: Advances2772-963X2025-03-0143101589Mitral Valve RepairIrbaz Hameed, MD0Adham Ahmed, BS1Christina Waldron, BS2Percy T. Algarate, MD3Michal Kawczynski, MD4Maurish Fatima, MBBS, BS5Amnah Alhazmi, MBBS6Samantha Colon, BS7Alexandria Brackett, MA, MLIS8Samuel Heuts, MD, PhD9Peyman Sardari Nia, MD, PhD10Mario Gaudino, MD, PhD11Vinay Badhwar, MD12Arnar Geirsson, MD13Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Address for correspondence: Dr Irbaz Hameed, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, 20 York Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA.Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USADivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USADivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the NetherlandsDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USADivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USADivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USADivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USADepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USADepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USADivision of Cardiac Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USABackground: Despite strong recommendations from multiple societies to pursue durable mitral valve repair (MVr), repair rates and outcomes remain inconsistent across the world. This is partly due to limited surgeon and center experience and lack of centralization of care for this technically challenging operation. Objectives: The authors evaluate the association between annual case volume and contemporary long-term outcomes of patients undergoing isolated MVr. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify contemporary studies on isolated MVr in adults from January 2013 to November 2023. The primary outcomes were long-term survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation (moderate-severe). A novel meta-analytic volume-outcome approach using reconstructed Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data from the original studies was used. A frailty Cox model was applied to study volume-outcome relationships. Studies were pooled for each reported outcome and divided into 3 tertiles (T1-3) based on the annual case volume and number of patients of each center. Results: A total of 14,070 patients from 60 studies were pooled. Sixteen studies (6,099 patients) reported long-term survival. The overall pooled 10-year survival was 70.8% (95% CI: 68.9%-72.8%). Compared to lower volume centers, centers performing >38 cases/y were associated with significantly improved long-term survival (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.36-0.49; P < 0.001). For degenerative mitral valve disease, a volume cutoff of >45 cases/y was associated with significantly improved long-term survival (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.32-0.49; P < 0.001). Twelve studies (4,230 patients) reported long-term freedom from reoperation and 10 studies (2,470 patients) reported Kaplan-Meier-derived long-term freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation data, respectively. The overall pooled 10-year freedom from reoperation was 90.2% (95% CI: 88.1%-92.4%), while the overall pooled 10-year freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation was 72.7% (95% CI: 68.9%-76.8%). Centers performing >45 cases/y (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.84; P = 0.003) and >70 cases/y (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.42-0.98; P = 0.042) were associated with significantly improved long-term freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation and freedom from reoperation, respectively. For degenerative mitral disease, >45 cases/y was associated with significantly improved freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.36-0.72; P < 0.001); the volume outcome association for freedom from reoperation was not statistically significant (P = 0.58). Conclusions: Our study validates volume cutoffs associated with optimal long-term outcomes following isolated MVr. We found MVr volumes of >38 cases/y, 45 cases/y, and >70 cases/y to be associated with significantly improved long-term survival, durability of repair, and freedom from reoperation, respectively. These findings may define experienced centers and surgeons for patients requiring MVr for primary/degenerative mitral valve disease.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25000067annuloplastymitral valverepairvolume
spellingShingle Irbaz Hameed, MD
Adham Ahmed, BS
Christina Waldron, BS
Percy T. Algarate, MD
Michal Kawczynski, MD
Maurish Fatima, MBBS, BS
Amnah Alhazmi, MBBS
Samantha Colon, BS
Alexandria Brackett, MA, MLIS
Samuel Heuts, MD, PhD
Peyman Sardari Nia, MD, PhD
Mario Gaudino, MD, PhD
Vinay Badhwar, MD
Arnar Geirsson, MD
Mitral Valve Repair
JACC: Advances
annuloplasty
mitral valve
repair
volume
title Mitral Valve Repair
title_full Mitral Valve Repair
title_fullStr Mitral Valve Repair
title_full_unstemmed Mitral Valve Repair
title_short Mitral Valve Repair
title_sort mitral valve repair
topic annuloplasty
mitral valve
repair
volume
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25000067
work_keys_str_mv AT irbazhameedmd mitralvalverepair
AT adhamahmedbs mitralvalverepair
AT christinawaldronbs mitralvalverepair
AT percytalgaratemd mitralvalverepair
AT michalkawczynskimd mitralvalverepair
AT maurishfatimambbsbs mitralvalverepair
AT amnahalhazmimbbs mitralvalverepair
AT samanthacolonbs mitralvalverepair
AT alexandriabrackettmamlis mitralvalverepair
AT samuelheutsmdphd mitralvalverepair
AT peymansardariniamdphd mitralvalverepair
AT mariogaudinomdphd mitralvalverepair
AT vinaybadhwarmd mitralvalverepair
AT arnargeirssonmd mitralvalverepair