“Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений

The article discusses early Soviet literary institutions that took on the mission of uniting the writers’ forces: VAPP (the All-Russian Association of Proletarian Writers), whose institutional practices exhibit a pronounced sectarian nature and confrontational strategies, closely related to the ear...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dar’ia Moskovskaia, Vagif Guseinov
Format: Article
Language:Belarusian
Published: Aracne editrice 2025-02-01
Series:eSamizdat
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.esamizdat.it/ojs/index.php/eS/article/view/216
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823857314949496832
author Dar’ia Moskovskaia
Vagif Guseinov
author_facet Dar’ia Moskovskaia
Vagif Guseinov
author_sort Dar’ia Moskovskaia
collection DOAJ
description The article discusses early Soviet literary institutions that took on the mission of uniting the writers’ forces: VAPP (the All-Russian Association of Proletarian Writers), whose institutional practices exhibit a pronounced sectarian nature and confrontational strategies, closely related to the early Proletkul’t, and demonstrate a distinctly ‘creative’ class-based nature; FOSP (the Federation of Soviet Writers), whose institutional nature was instrumental and artificial, this institution being “the first real example of the party’s concern for establishing basic conditions for the growth of new culture in the early years of the new regime” (Metcalf); and the Organizing Committee of the Union of Soviet Writers (SSP), which, despite sharing some similarities with FOSP, fundamentally differed from the latter through direct party leadership and funding, and gradually became a state structure – the Union of Soviet Writers. The article examines the dynamics of the Organizing Committee’s structure, marked by an increasing ‘clarification’ of who held ultimate authority. These dynamics include nationwide tense discussions among writers about funding mechanisms, continued ‘showdowns’ with enemy-colleagues, the development of the concept of socialist realism as a method for unifying writers of various social backgrounds, the “organization of total control in the literary sphere” (Frezinskii), and the complete loss (through the Charter and other practices) of institutionally formalized creative freedom for members of the Writers’ Union.
format Article
id doaj-art-e3a2a0b51d5242818989d0f333b98981
institution Kabale University
issn 1723-4042
language Belarusian
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Aracne editrice
record_format Article
series eSamizdat
spelling doaj-art-e3a2a0b51d5242818989d0f333b989812025-02-11T21:56:00ZbelAracne editriceeSamizdat1723-40422025-02-0117234“Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединенийDar’ia Moskovskaia0Vagif Guseinov1A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature, Russian Academy of SciencesStroganov Russian State University of Design and Applied Arts The article discusses early Soviet literary institutions that took on the mission of uniting the writers’ forces: VAPP (the All-Russian Association of Proletarian Writers), whose institutional practices exhibit a pronounced sectarian nature and confrontational strategies, closely related to the early Proletkul’t, and demonstrate a distinctly ‘creative’ class-based nature; FOSP (the Federation of Soviet Writers), whose institutional nature was instrumental and artificial, this institution being “the first real example of the party’s concern for establishing basic conditions for the growth of new culture in the early years of the new regime” (Metcalf); and the Organizing Committee of the Union of Soviet Writers (SSP), which, despite sharing some similarities with FOSP, fundamentally differed from the latter through direct party leadership and funding, and gradually became a state structure – the Union of Soviet Writers. The article examines the dynamics of the Organizing Committee’s structure, marked by an increasing ‘clarification’ of who held ultimate authority. These dynamics include nationwide tense discussions among writers about funding mechanisms, continued ‘showdowns’ with enemy-colleagues, the development of the concept of socialist realism as a method for unifying writers of various social backgrounds, the “organization of total control in the literary sphere” (Frezinskii), and the complete loss (through the Charter and other practices) of institutionally formalized creative freedom for members of the Writers’ Union. https://www.esamizdat.it/ojs/index.php/eS/article/view/216CharterOrganisational StructureWriters’ UnionsLiterary PracticesSociology of 1920s Literary Process
spellingShingle Dar’ia Moskovskaia
Vagif Guseinov
“Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений
eSamizdat
Charter
Organisational Structure
Writers’ Unions
Literary Practices
Sociology of 1920s Literary Process
title “Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений
title_full “Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений
title_fullStr “Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений
title_full_unstemmed “Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений
title_short “Новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи”. Об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений
title_sort новая литература не возникает как пистолетный выстрел в ночи об институциональных границах первых советских массовых писательских объединений
topic Charter
Organisational Structure
Writers’ Unions
Literary Practices
Sociology of 1920s Literary Process
url https://www.esamizdat.it/ojs/index.php/eS/article/view/216
work_keys_str_mv AT dariamoskovskaia novaâliteraturanevoznikaetkakpistoletnyjvystrelvnočiobinstitucionalʹnyhgranicahpervyhsovetskihmassovyhpisatelʹskihobʺedinenij
AT vagifguseinov novaâliteraturanevoznikaetkakpistoletnyjvystrelvnočiobinstitucionalʹnyhgranicahpervyhsovetskihmassovyhpisatelʹskihobʺedinenij