Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?

# Background Collegiate distance runners often suffer from running overuse injuries (ROI). The Y-Balance Test (YBT) has the potential to predict ROI risk in collegiate runners. # Purpose To investigate whether a preseason clinical assessment of dynamic balance, through a modified version of the Y...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanz Tao, Creighton Thompson, Steven Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2021-12-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.29871
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825196976369565696
author Hanz Tao
Creighton Thompson
Steven Weber
author_facet Hanz Tao
Creighton Thompson
Steven Weber
author_sort Hanz Tao
collection DOAJ
description # Background Collegiate distance runners often suffer from running overuse injuries (ROI). The Y-Balance Test (YBT) has the potential to predict ROI risk in collegiate runners. # Purpose To investigate whether a preseason clinical assessment of dynamic balance, through a modified version of the YBT (mYBT), can predict risk of ROIs during one NCAA Division I cross-country (XC) season. # Study Design Prospective case-control study # Methods Participants from a Division I XC team were screened for mYBT performance in four directions: anterior (AN), posteromedial (PM), posterolateral (PL), and posterior (PO). ROIs were tracked over the course of the XC season. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (α = 0.05) was utilized to investigate the effectiveness of the mYBT in predicting injury risk. # Results Nine (5 female, 4 male) of 29 runners developed an ROI during the XC season. Five components of the mYBT were found to predict injuries, including normalized nondominant PO score (AUC = 0.756, p = 0.03; RR = 1.90), AN raw difference and limb asymmetry (AUC = 0.808, p = 0.01), and PM raw difference and limb asymmetry in males (AUC = 0.958, p = 0.02). # Conclusion Specific components of the mYBT can help predict the risk of developing a running overuse injury over one Division I XC season. # Level of Evidence Screening, Level 3
format Article
id doaj-art-ea0ffeb26e6e4ddfbf9670171a47b97c
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-ea0ffeb26e6e4ddfbf9670171a47b97c2025-02-11T20:29:56ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962021-12-01166Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?Hanz TaoCreighton ThompsonSteven Weber# Background Collegiate distance runners often suffer from running overuse injuries (ROI). The Y-Balance Test (YBT) has the potential to predict ROI risk in collegiate runners. # Purpose To investigate whether a preseason clinical assessment of dynamic balance, through a modified version of the YBT (mYBT), can predict risk of ROIs during one NCAA Division I cross-country (XC) season. # Study Design Prospective case-control study # Methods Participants from a Division I XC team were screened for mYBT performance in four directions: anterior (AN), posteromedial (PM), posterolateral (PL), and posterior (PO). ROIs were tracked over the course of the XC season. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (α = 0.05) was utilized to investigate the effectiveness of the mYBT in predicting injury risk. # Results Nine (5 female, 4 male) of 29 runners developed an ROI during the XC season. Five components of the mYBT were found to predict injuries, including normalized nondominant PO score (AUC = 0.756, p = 0.03; RR = 1.90), AN raw difference and limb asymmetry (AUC = 0.808, p = 0.01), and PM raw difference and limb asymmetry in males (AUC = 0.958, p = 0.02). # Conclusion Specific components of the mYBT can help predict the risk of developing a running overuse injury over one Division I XC season. # Level of Evidence Screening, Level 3https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.29871
spellingShingle Hanz Tao
Creighton Thompson
Steven Weber
Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?
title_full Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?
title_fullStr Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?
title_full_unstemmed Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?
title_short Can a Modified Y-Balance Test Predict Running Overuse Injuries over the Course of a Division I Collegiate Cross-Country Season?
title_sort can a modified y balance test predict running overuse injuries over the course of a division i collegiate cross country season
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.29871
work_keys_str_mv AT hanztao canamodifiedybalancetestpredictrunningoveruseinjuriesoverthecourseofadivisionicollegiatecrosscountryseason
AT creightonthompson canamodifiedybalancetestpredictrunningoveruseinjuriesoverthecourseofadivisionicollegiatecrosscountryseason
AT stevenweber canamodifiedybalancetestpredictrunningoveruseinjuriesoverthecourseofadivisionicollegiatecrosscountryseason