“Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain

Abstract Background Routine seeking of imaging for patients with low back pain is not concordant with the evidence-based recommendation that imaging is rarely of diagnostic value. Inappropriate imaging is a waste of resources and can lead to undesirable downstream effects for individuals and health...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynn Haslam-Larmer, Kathleen E. Norman, Andrea M. Patey, Isabella M. Thomas, Michael E. Green, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Jill A. Hayden, Jan Hartvigsen, Noah M. Ivers, Hazel Jenkins, Simon D. French
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:BMC Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02726-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861768181514240
author Lynn Haslam-Larmer
Kathleen E. Norman
Andrea M. Patey
Isabella M. Thomas
Michael E. Green
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jill A. Hayden
Jan Hartvigsen
Noah M. Ivers
Hazel Jenkins
Simon D. French
author_facet Lynn Haslam-Larmer
Kathleen E. Norman
Andrea M. Patey
Isabella M. Thomas
Michael E. Green
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jill A. Hayden
Jan Hartvigsen
Noah M. Ivers
Hazel Jenkins
Simon D. French
author_sort Lynn Haslam-Larmer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Routine seeking of imaging for patients with low back pain is not concordant with the evidence-based recommendation that imaging is rarely of diagnostic value. Inappropriate imaging is a waste of resources and can lead to undesirable downstream effects for individuals and health systems. To develop effective strategies to reduce unwarranted referrals for imaging in primary care, we must understand the drivers for, and barriers to, guideline-adherent practice. We explored clinicians’ views to identify the dominant influences on clinicians as they choose to pursue, or avoid, imaging for their patients with low back pain. Methods We interviewed a purposeful sample of 47 primary care clinicians (14 physiotherapists, 18 chiropractors, 15 physicians) throughout Ontario, Canada, with a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We investigated clinicians’ views about their use of imaging in the management of low back pain. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analysed transcripts, then identified themes within TDF domains. Results Most clinicians reported that, for most clinical encounters, they adhered to guideline recommendations about imaging. Many clinicians across disciplines expressed the following themes: (1) imaging may result in an incidental finding or otherwise cause harm to patients, and drive up health system costs (TDF domain Beliefs about consequences); (2) clinicians were confident in their abilities to diagnose, to explain to patients the rationale for not recommending imaging, and to respond to their needs (domains Beliefs about capabilities; Skills). Many clinicians identified that patients occasionally want the validation that imaging provides (domain Social influences). Some clinicians described the value of imaging to corroborate a diagnosis (domain Beliefs about consequences). Conclusions This study is the first to examine influences on imaging behaviours of a large interprofessional sample of primary care clinicians in Canada. Even among knowledgeable, skilled, confident clinicians who reported mostly adhering to guideline recommendations, there are potential influences on deviating from guideline-adherent care.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee65453d7ccb431f8e26deca74c41c86
institution Kabale University
issn 2731-4553
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Primary Care
spelling doaj-art-ee65453d7ccb431f8e26deca74c41c862025-02-09T12:48:32ZengBMCBMC Primary Care2731-45532025-02-0126111710.1186/s12875-025-02726-z“Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back painLynn Haslam-Larmer0Kathleen E. Norman1Andrea M. Patey2Isabella M. Thomas3Michael E. Green4Jeremy M. Grimshaw5Jill A. Hayden6Jan Hartvigsen7Noah M. Ivers8Hazel Jenkins9Simon D. French10Queen’s UniversityQueen’s UniversityDepartment of Medicine, Quality and Safety, IWK HealthQueen’s UniversityQueen’s UniversityOttawa Hospital Research InstituteDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Southern DenmarkUniversity of TorontoMacquarie UniversityQueen’s UniversityAbstract Background Routine seeking of imaging for patients with low back pain is not concordant with the evidence-based recommendation that imaging is rarely of diagnostic value. Inappropriate imaging is a waste of resources and can lead to undesirable downstream effects for individuals and health systems. To develop effective strategies to reduce unwarranted referrals for imaging in primary care, we must understand the drivers for, and barriers to, guideline-adherent practice. We explored clinicians’ views to identify the dominant influences on clinicians as they choose to pursue, or avoid, imaging for their patients with low back pain. Methods We interviewed a purposeful sample of 47 primary care clinicians (14 physiotherapists, 18 chiropractors, 15 physicians) throughout Ontario, Canada, with a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We investigated clinicians’ views about their use of imaging in the management of low back pain. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analysed transcripts, then identified themes within TDF domains. Results Most clinicians reported that, for most clinical encounters, they adhered to guideline recommendations about imaging. Many clinicians across disciplines expressed the following themes: (1) imaging may result in an incidental finding or otherwise cause harm to patients, and drive up health system costs (TDF domain Beliefs about consequences); (2) clinicians were confident in their abilities to diagnose, to explain to patients the rationale for not recommending imaging, and to respond to their needs (domains Beliefs about capabilities; Skills). Many clinicians identified that patients occasionally want the validation that imaging provides (domain Social influences). Some clinicians described the value of imaging to corroborate a diagnosis (domain Beliefs about consequences). Conclusions This study is the first to examine influences on imaging behaviours of a large interprofessional sample of primary care clinicians in Canada. Even among knowledgeable, skilled, confident clinicians who reported mostly adhering to guideline recommendations, there are potential influences on deviating from guideline-adherent care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02726-zLow back painGuidelinesImagingTheoretical Domains Framework
spellingShingle Lynn Haslam-Larmer
Kathleen E. Norman
Andrea M. Patey
Isabella M. Thomas
Michael E. Green
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jill A. Hayden
Jan Hartvigsen
Noah M. Ivers
Hazel Jenkins
Simon D. French
“Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain
BMC Primary Care
Low back pain
Guidelines
Imaging
Theoretical Domains Framework
title “Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain
title_full “Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain
title_fullStr “Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain
title_full_unstemmed “Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain
title_short “Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam,” and “reasonably confident without imaging”: a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain
title_sort gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam and reasonably confident without imaging a qualitative study of primary care clinicians management of patients with low back pain
topic Low back pain
Guidelines
Imaging
Theoretical Domains Framework
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02726-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnhaslamlarmer gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT kathleenenorman gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT andreampatey gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT isabellamthomas gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT michaelegreen gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jeremymgrimshaw gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jillahayden gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT janhartvigsen gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT noahmivers gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT hazeljenkins gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT simondfrench gleaningalotfromthehistoryandphysicalexamandreasonablyconfidentwithoutimagingaqualitativestudyofprimarycarecliniciansmanagementofpatientswithlowbackpain