Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case study

Study region: Canada Study focus: High-resolution bias-corrected daily precipitation projections are of great value for regional climate impact assessment. The study evaluates the performance of bias correction techniques in developing high-resolution daily precipitation simulations over Canada. Qua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinyi Li, Zhong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825000473
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856871669235712
author Xinyi Li
Zhong Li
author_facet Xinyi Li
Zhong Li
author_sort Xinyi Li
collection DOAJ
description Study region: Canada Study focus: High-resolution bias-corrected daily precipitation projections are of great value for regional climate impact assessment. The study evaluates the performance of bias correction techniques in developing high-resolution daily precipitation simulations over Canada. Quantile Delta Mapping (QDM) and Scaled Distribution Mapping (SDM) are employed to bias correct Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) general circulation models (GCMs). New hydrological insights for the region: CMIP6 raw and bias corrected GCMs demonstrate alignment with observations. Raw GCMs overestimate middle and high quantiles and show better performance in winter than in summer. QDM and SDM substantially enhance the performance of individual GCMs, which reduces RMSE by 26 % and 21 %, and shows satisfactory skill in capturing seasonal cycle and spatial variability as well as reproducing probability distribution of daily series and extreme events. The ensemble means of models are skillful for frequent precipitation values but overestimate low quantiles and underestimate high quantiles at a daily scale. Bias corrected ensemble means demonstrate superior performance for the whole distribution including the high and low extremes. SDM outperforms QDM with extreme bias reduced by 85 % and 78 % compared to raw GCMs. The best performing model is SDM corrected ensemble mean. The comprehensive evaluation of daily precipitation bias correction with CMIP6 GCMs over Canada contributes to further climate impact assessment around the world.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa094be64b67459192d82e8178c5aed8
institution Kabale University
issn 2214-5818
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
spelling doaj-art-fa094be64b67459192d82e8178c5aed82025-02-12T05:31:08ZengElsevierJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies2214-58182025-04-0158102223Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case studyXinyi Li0Zhong Li1Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaCorresponding author.; Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaStudy region: Canada Study focus: High-resolution bias-corrected daily precipitation projections are of great value for regional climate impact assessment. The study evaluates the performance of bias correction techniques in developing high-resolution daily precipitation simulations over Canada. Quantile Delta Mapping (QDM) and Scaled Distribution Mapping (SDM) are employed to bias correct Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) general circulation models (GCMs). New hydrological insights for the region: CMIP6 raw and bias corrected GCMs demonstrate alignment with observations. Raw GCMs overestimate middle and high quantiles and show better performance in winter than in summer. QDM and SDM substantially enhance the performance of individual GCMs, which reduces RMSE by 26 % and 21 %, and shows satisfactory skill in capturing seasonal cycle and spatial variability as well as reproducing probability distribution of daily series and extreme events. The ensemble means of models are skillful for frequent precipitation values but overestimate low quantiles and underestimate high quantiles at a daily scale. Bias corrected ensemble means demonstrate superior performance for the whole distribution including the high and low extremes. SDM outperforms QDM with extreme bias reduced by 85 % and 78 % compared to raw GCMs. The best performing model is SDM corrected ensemble mean. The comprehensive evaluation of daily precipitation bias correction with CMIP6 GCMs over Canada contributes to further climate impact assessment around the world.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825000473PrecipitationBias correctionCMIP6Quantile delta mappingScaled distribution mappingCanada
spellingShingle Xinyi Li
Zhong Li
Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case study
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Precipitation
Bias correction
CMIP6
Quantile delta mapping
Scaled distribution mapping
Canada
title Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case study
title_full Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case study
title_fullStr Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case study
title_short Assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with CMIP6 models: A Canadian case study
title_sort assessment of bias correction methods for high resolution daily precipitation projections with cmip6 models a canadian case study
topic Precipitation
Bias correction
CMIP6
Quantile delta mapping
Scaled distribution mapping
Canada
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825000473
work_keys_str_mv AT xinyili assessmentofbiascorrectionmethodsforhighresolutiondailyprecipitationprojectionswithcmip6modelsacanadiancasestudy
AT zhongli assessmentofbiascorrectionmethodsforhighresolutiondailyprecipitationprojectionswithcmip6modelsacanadiancasestudy