A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in opposition

This article investigates some aspects of Daniel 2 and attempts to demonstrate the value of the literary-historical approach to biblical texts. The literary-historical approach consists of three   elements: a structural, a historical and a narrative analysis of the text. Firstly, the structural inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Nel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2002-06-01
Series:Acta Theologica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/1544
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858308953407488
author M. Nel
author_facet M. Nel
author_sort M. Nel
collection DOAJ
description This article investigates some aspects of Daniel 2 and attempts to demonstrate the value of the literary-historical approach to biblical texts. The literary-historical approach consists of three   elements: a structural, a historical and a narrative analysis of the text. Firstly, the structural investigation uses Propp’s model for a functional analysis of the text, followed by a semiotic analysis to identify the functions and qualifications in the text. A description of the functions and qualifications is essential in order to identify the text’s pertinent transformations as well as its underlying semiotic squares. The latter enables the researcher to formulate the theological values or persuasions which the writer wished to convey to her readers. Secondly, synchronic and diachronic insights are integrated in an analysis of the text. Lastly, the results of the study are concluded in a narrative synthesis, in terms of the narrator, setting, characters, plot and style. In Daniel 2 the Babylonian king, shortly after being enthroned, dreams about his political insecurity. The narrator emphasises that it is God who appoints and dethrones kings. He reveals the future (Dan. 2:29, 47). He rules over the world (Dan. 2:21, 37, 44), and He cares for His people (Dan. 2:48-49). Israel will rule over the world once God destroys all other kingdoms (Dan. 2:44-45). The narrator of Daniel 2 conveys two persuasions to her readers: she emphasises the sovereign rule of God, not only in Jerusalem but also in Babylon, and the responsibility of the faithful. Most researchers accept that the tale in Daniel 2 is not literally true. It should be read as a literary text. However, the tale has also functioned in various historical contexts and should be read from a historical-critical perspective. The hypothesis of this article is that the tale in Daniel 2 would be better understood if read from a literary as well as historical perspective.
format Article
id doaj-art-fc899bb40e2a4f52884ad431ca31b745
institution Kabale University
issn 1015-8758
2309-9089
language English
publishDate 2002-06-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Theologica
spelling doaj-art-fc899bb40e2a4f52884ad431ca31b7452025-02-11T12:36:11ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Theologica1015-87582309-90892002-06-0122110.38140/at.v22i1.1544A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in oppositionM. Nel0University of Pretoria This article investigates some aspects of Daniel 2 and attempts to demonstrate the value of the literary-historical approach to biblical texts. The literary-historical approach consists of three   elements: a structural, a historical and a narrative analysis of the text. Firstly, the structural investigation uses Propp’s model for a functional analysis of the text, followed by a semiotic analysis to identify the functions and qualifications in the text. A description of the functions and qualifications is essential in order to identify the text’s pertinent transformations as well as its underlying semiotic squares. The latter enables the researcher to formulate the theological values or persuasions which the writer wished to convey to her readers. Secondly, synchronic and diachronic insights are integrated in an analysis of the text. Lastly, the results of the study are concluded in a narrative synthesis, in terms of the narrator, setting, characters, plot and style. In Daniel 2 the Babylonian king, shortly after being enthroned, dreams about his political insecurity. The narrator emphasises that it is God who appoints and dethrones kings. He reveals the future (Dan. 2:29, 47). He rules over the world (Dan. 2:21, 37, 44), and He cares for His people (Dan. 2:48-49). Israel will rule over the world once God destroys all other kingdoms (Dan. 2:44-45). The narrator of Daniel 2 conveys two persuasions to her readers: she emphasises the sovereign rule of God, not only in Jerusalem but also in Babylon, and the responsibility of the faithful. Most researchers accept that the tale in Daniel 2 is not literally true. It should be read as a literary text. However, the tale has also functioned in various historical contexts and should be read from a historical-critical perspective. The hypothesis of this article is that the tale in Daniel 2 would be better understood if read from a literary as well as historical perspective. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/1544Old Testament exegesisLiterary-historical approachDaniel 2Ou-Testamentiese eksegeseLiterêr-historiese benaderingDaniël 2
spellingShingle M. Nel
A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in opposition
Acta Theologica
Old Testament exegesis
Literary-historical approach
Daniel 2
Ou-Testamentiese eksegese
Literêr-historiese benadering
Daniël 2
title A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in opposition
title_full A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in opposition
title_fullStr A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in opposition
title_full_unstemmed A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in opposition
title_short A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: two powers in opposition
title_sort literary historical analysis of daniel 2 two powers in opposition
topic Old Testament exegesis
Literary-historical approach
Daniel 2
Ou-Testamentiese eksegese
Literêr-historiese benadering
Daniël 2
url https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/1544
work_keys_str_mv AT mnel aliteraryhistoricalanalysisofdaniel2twopowersinopposition
AT mnel literaryhistoricalanalysisofdaniel2twopowersinopposition