Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting

**Background:** Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common and distressing surgical complication that may be associated with the pharmacological reversal technique of neuromuscular blockade (NMB). **Objective:** This study aimed to investigate the impact that POUR has on medical charges. *...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weijia Wang, Arielle Marks-Anglin, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Robert J. Mark, Aurelio Otero Rosales, Nathaniel W. Bailey, Yiling Jiang, Joseph Abueg, Ira S. Hofer, Toby N. Weingarten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2024-08-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.121641
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860319814942720
author Weijia Wang
Arielle Marks-Anglin
Vladimir Turzhitsky
Robert J. Mark
Aurelio Otero Rosales
Nathaniel W. Bailey
Yiling Jiang
Joseph Abueg
Ira S. Hofer
Toby N. Weingarten
author_facet Weijia Wang
Arielle Marks-Anglin
Vladimir Turzhitsky
Robert J. Mark
Aurelio Otero Rosales
Nathaniel W. Bailey
Yiling Jiang
Joseph Abueg
Ira S. Hofer
Toby N. Weingarten
author_sort Weijia Wang
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common and distressing surgical complication that may be associated with the pharmacological reversal technique of neuromuscular blockade (NMB). **Objective:** This study aimed to investigate the impact that POUR has on medical charges. **Methods:** This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients undergoing select surgeries who were administered neuromuscular blockade agent (NMBA), which was pharmacologically reversed between February 2017 and November 2021 using data from the PINC-AI™ Healthcare Database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those experiencing POUR (composite of retention of urine, insertion of temporary indwelling bladder catheter, insertion of non-indwelling bladder catheter) during index hospitalization following surgery and those without POUR. Surgeries in inpatient and outpatient settings were analyzed separately. A cross-sectional comparison was performed to report total hospital charges for the 2 groups. Furthermore, patients experiencing subsequent POUR events within three days after discharge from index hospitalization were studied. **Results:** A total of 330&#8239;838 inpatients and 437&#8239;063 outpatients were included. POUR developed in 13&#8239;020 inpatients and 2756 outpatients. Unadjusted results showed that POUR was associated with greater charges in both inpatient ($92&#8239;529 with POUR vs $78&#8239;556 without POUR, _p_ < .001) and outpatient ($48&#8239;996 with POUR vs $35&#8239;433 without POUR, _p_ < .001) settings. After adjusting for confounders, POUR was found to be associated with greater charges with an overall mean adjusted difference of $10&#8239;668 (95% confidence interval \[CI\] $95 760-$11&#8239;760, p < .001) in inpatient and $13&#8239;160 (95% CI $11&#8239;750-$14 &#8239;571, _p_ < .001) in outpatient settings. Charges associated with subsequent POUR events following discharge ranged from $9418 inpatient charges to $1694 outpatient charges. **Conclusions:** Surgical patients who were pharmacologically reversed for NMB and developed a POUR event incurred greater charges than patients without POUR. These findings support the use of NMB reversal agents associated with a lower incidence of POUR.
format Article
id doaj-art-fd353115ab8a498caebb78cba33391f6
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-fd353115ab8a498caebb78cba33391f62025-02-10T16:13:34ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362024-08-01112Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital SettingWeijia WangArielle Marks-AnglinVladimir TurzhitskyRobert J. MarkAurelio Otero RosalesNathaniel W. BaileyYiling JiangJoseph AbuegIra S. HoferToby N. Weingarten**Background:** Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common and distressing surgical complication that may be associated with the pharmacological reversal technique of neuromuscular blockade (NMB). **Objective:** This study aimed to investigate the impact that POUR has on medical charges. **Methods:** This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients undergoing select surgeries who were administered neuromuscular blockade agent (NMBA), which was pharmacologically reversed between February 2017 and November 2021 using data from the PINC-AI™ Healthcare Database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those experiencing POUR (composite of retention of urine, insertion of temporary indwelling bladder catheter, insertion of non-indwelling bladder catheter) during index hospitalization following surgery and those without POUR. Surgeries in inpatient and outpatient settings were analyzed separately. A cross-sectional comparison was performed to report total hospital charges for the 2 groups. Furthermore, patients experiencing subsequent POUR events within three days after discharge from index hospitalization were studied. **Results:** A total of 330&#8239;838 inpatients and 437&#8239;063 outpatients were included. POUR developed in 13&#8239;020 inpatients and 2756 outpatients. Unadjusted results showed that POUR was associated with greater charges in both inpatient ($92&#8239;529 with POUR vs $78&#8239;556 without POUR, _p_ < .001) and outpatient ($48&#8239;996 with POUR vs $35&#8239;433 without POUR, _p_ < .001) settings. After adjusting for confounders, POUR was found to be associated with greater charges with an overall mean adjusted difference of $10&#8239;668 (95% confidence interval \[CI\] $95 760-$11&#8239;760, p < .001) in inpatient and $13&#8239;160 (95% CI $11&#8239;750-$14 &#8239;571, _p_ < .001) in outpatient settings. Charges associated with subsequent POUR events following discharge ranged from $9418 inpatient charges to $1694 outpatient charges. **Conclusions:** Surgical patients who were pharmacologically reversed for NMB and developed a POUR event incurred greater charges than patients without POUR. These findings support the use of NMB reversal agents associated with a lower incidence of POUR.https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.121641
spellingShingle Weijia Wang
Arielle Marks-Anglin
Vladimir Turzhitsky
Robert J. Mark
Aurelio Otero Rosales
Nathaniel W. Bailey
Yiling Jiang
Joseph Abueg
Ira S. Hofer
Toby N. Weingarten
Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting
title_full Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting
title_fullStr Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting
title_full_unstemmed Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting
title_short Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting
title_sort economic impact of postoperative urinary retention in the us hospital setting
url https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.121641
work_keys_str_mv AT weijiawang economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT ariellemarksanglin economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT vladimirturzhitsky economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT robertjmark economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT aureliooterorosales economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT nathanielwbailey economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT yilingjiang economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT josephabueg economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT irashofer economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting
AT tobynweingarten economicimpactofpostoperativeurinaryretentionintheushospitalsetting