Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)

BackgroundMechanical ventilation can lead to lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction. Rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (rBAMPS) may attenuate both of the aforementioned issues by inducing diaphragm activation. However, in order for rBAMPS to become part of standard...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyle G. P. J. M. Boyle, Andrea A. Beglinger, Heinrich Häusler, Anna Stahel, Esther I. Schwarz, Christina M. Spengler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1481766/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859224266932224
author Kyle G. P. J. M. Boyle
Andrea A. Beglinger
Heinrich Häusler
Anna Stahel
Esther I. Schwarz
Esther I. Schwarz
Christina M. Spengler
Christina M. Spengler
author_facet Kyle G. P. J. M. Boyle
Andrea A. Beglinger
Heinrich Häusler
Anna Stahel
Esther I. Schwarz
Esther I. Schwarz
Christina M. Spengler
Christina M. Spengler
author_sort Kyle G. P. J. M. Boyle
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundMechanical ventilation can lead to lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction. Rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (rBAMPS) may attenuate both of the aforementioned issues by inducing diaphragm activation. However, in order for rBAMPS to become part of standard of care, the reliability of inspiratory responses to rBAMPS needs to be established.MethodsEighteen healthy participants (9F) underwent five blocks of 1-s rBAMPS at 25 Hz starting at 20% of maximal stimulator output with 10% increments. Three blocks were completed on the same day to test within-day reliability, and two additional blocks were each completed on subsequent days to test between-day reliability. Mean transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi,mean), tidal volume (VT), discomfort, pain, and paresthesia were recorded for each rBAMPS. Relative and absolute reliability of both Pdi,mean and VT were quantified by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM), respectively. An ordinal regression was used to determine changes of sensory ratings within and between days.ResultsAt all stimulator outputs, within-day Pdi,mean displayed “good” reliability (ICC range 0.78–0.89). Between days, Pdi,mean reliability was also “good” (ICC range 0.79–0.87) at stimulator outputs of 20%–50% of maximum, but “moderate” (ICC range 0.56–0.72) at stimulator outputs of 60%–100%. SEM for Pdi,mean within day ranged from 0.9 to 3.4 across tested stimulator outputs and increased on average by 1.4 ± 0.9 between days. The VT reliability was “good” to “excellent” within (ICC range 0.82–0.94) and between (ICC range 0.81–0.96) days at all stimulator outputs. SEM for VT within day ranged from 0.08 to 0.36 and from 0.11 to 0.30 between days and tended to be larger at stimulator outputs greater than 50% of maximum. Subsequent blocks within day were associated with decreased discomfort and pain (P ≤ 0.043), while subsequent days were associated with decreased discomfort and paresthesia (P < 0.001).DiscussionrBAMPS appears to induce reliable diaphragmatic contractions, while select sensory responses become blunted over repeated stimulations. However, as reliability is slightly lower between days compared to within day, stimulation parameters may need to be adjusted to achieve similar responses on different days.
format Article
id doaj-art-ffe9c5fe7de042ddaf1a464921bcfe0d
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-042X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj-art-ffe9c5fe7de042ddaf1a464921bcfe0d2025-02-11T06:59:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2025-02-011610.3389/fphys.2025.14817661481766Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)Kyle G. P. J. M. Boyle0Andrea A. Beglinger1Heinrich Häusler2Anna Stahel3Esther I. Schwarz4Esther I. Schwarz5Christina M. Spengler6Christina M. Spengler7Exercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandExercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandExercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandExercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandExercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandZurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandBackgroundMechanical ventilation can lead to lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction. Rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (rBAMPS) may attenuate both of the aforementioned issues by inducing diaphragm activation. However, in order for rBAMPS to become part of standard of care, the reliability of inspiratory responses to rBAMPS needs to be established.MethodsEighteen healthy participants (9F) underwent five blocks of 1-s rBAMPS at 25 Hz starting at 20% of maximal stimulator output with 10% increments. Three blocks were completed on the same day to test within-day reliability, and two additional blocks were each completed on subsequent days to test between-day reliability. Mean transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi,mean), tidal volume (VT), discomfort, pain, and paresthesia were recorded for each rBAMPS. Relative and absolute reliability of both Pdi,mean and VT were quantified by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM), respectively. An ordinal regression was used to determine changes of sensory ratings within and between days.ResultsAt all stimulator outputs, within-day Pdi,mean displayed “good” reliability (ICC range 0.78–0.89). Between days, Pdi,mean reliability was also “good” (ICC range 0.79–0.87) at stimulator outputs of 20%–50% of maximum, but “moderate” (ICC range 0.56–0.72) at stimulator outputs of 60%–100%. SEM for Pdi,mean within day ranged from 0.9 to 3.4 across tested stimulator outputs and increased on average by 1.4 ± 0.9 between days. The VT reliability was “good” to “excellent” within (ICC range 0.82–0.94) and between (ICC range 0.81–0.96) days at all stimulator outputs. SEM for VT within day ranged from 0.08 to 0.36 and from 0.11 to 0.30 between days and tended to be larger at stimulator outputs greater than 50% of maximum. Subsequent blocks within day were associated with decreased discomfort and pain (P ≤ 0.043), while subsequent days were associated with decreased discomfort and paresthesia (P < 0.001).DiscussionrBAMPS appears to induce reliable diaphragmatic contractions, while select sensory responses become blunted over repeated stimulations. However, as reliability is slightly lower between days compared to within day, stimulation parameters may need to be adjusted to achieve similar responses on different days.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1481766/fullrapid magnetic stimulationphrenic nerve stimulationreliabilitydiaphragm contractiontidal volumetransdiaphragmatic pressure
spellingShingle Kyle G. P. J. M. Boyle
Andrea A. Beglinger
Heinrich Häusler
Anna Stahel
Esther I. Schwarz
Esther I. Schwarz
Christina M. Spengler
Christina M. Spengler
Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)
Frontiers in Physiology
rapid magnetic stimulation
phrenic nerve stimulation
reliability
diaphragm contraction
tidal volume
transdiaphragmatic pressure
title Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)
title_full Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)
title_fullStr Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)
title_full_unstemmed Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)
title_short Within- and between-day test–retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)
title_sort within and between day test retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans restim
topic rapid magnetic stimulation
phrenic nerve stimulation
reliability
diaphragm contraction
tidal volume
transdiaphragmatic pressure
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1481766/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kylegpjmboyle withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim
AT andreaabeglinger withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim
AT heinrichhausler withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim
AT annastahel withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim
AT estherischwarz withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim
AT estherischwarz withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim
AT christinamspengler withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim
AT christinamspengler withinandbetweendaytestretestreliabilityofresponsestorapidbilateralanterolateralmagneticphrenicnervestimulationinhealthyhumansrestim