The Book, deconstruction, and the religious sign
In this article, I investigate a possibility in the structure of the Qur’an for rethinking the usually forgotten issue of the religious sign. This is where deconstruction, guided by a certain otherness or transcendence, renders all God’s attributes as unthinkable. Thus, God’s presence is not the op...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of the Free State
2009-06-01
|
| Series: | Acta Theologica |
| Online Access: | https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2240 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823858730557505536 |
|---|---|
| author | A. Gheitury |
| author_facet | A. Gheitury |
| author_sort | A. Gheitury |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In this article, I investigate a possibility in the structure of the Qur’an for rethinking the usually forgotten issue of the religious sign. This is where deconstruction, guided by a certain otherness or transcendence, renders all God’s attributes as unthinkable. Thus, God’s presence is not the opposite of absence and his will is not in the way of our freedom. In fact, God is the Other, not in a dual system. Such an otherness brings about the idea of a sign which is non-dual in nature: It presents Allah as the Other who is never outside the Book.1 In addition, He is so near, yet no thing in the Book is like Him.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e009f1a9c13b49f3a0849ca6b89a370a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1015-8758 2309-9089 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2009-06-01 |
| publisher | University of the Free State |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Theologica |
| spelling | doaj-art-e009f1a9c13b49f3a0849ca6b89a370a2025-02-11T10:06:17ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Theologica1015-87582309-90892009-06-0129110.38140/at.v29i1.2240The Book, deconstruction, and the religious signA. Gheitury0University of Razi, Iran In this article, I investigate a possibility in the structure of the Qur’an for rethinking the usually forgotten issue of the religious sign. This is where deconstruction, guided by a certain otherness or transcendence, renders all God’s attributes as unthinkable. Thus, God’s presence is not the opposite of absence and his will is not in the way of our freedom. In fact, God is the Other, not in a dual system. Such an otherness brings about the idea of a sign which is non-dual in nature: It presents Allah as the Other who is never outside the Book.1 In addition, He is so near, yet no thing in the Book is like Him. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2240 |
| spellingShingle | A. Gheitury The Book, deconstruction, and the religious sign Acta Theologica |
| title | The Book, deconstruction, and the religious sign |
| title_full | The Book, deconstruction, and the religious sign |
| title_fullStr | The Book, deconstruction, and the religious sign |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Book, deconstruction, and the religious sign |
| title_short | The Book, deconstruction, and the religious sign |
| title_sort | book deconstruction and the religious sign |
| url | https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2240 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT agheitury thebookdeconstructionandthereligioussign AT agheitury bookdeconstructionandthereligioussign |