A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception

IntroductionMedical simulation has become an integral part of medical student education. There is a limited body of literature comparing virtual and high-fidelity simulation in terms of effectiveness and student perception.MethodsA total of 130 medical students at the University of Rzeszów participa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Izabela Sałacińska, Patrycja Trojnar, Krisztina Éles Gebriné, Viktória Törő, Attila Sárváry, Paweł Więch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1523768/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861001569697792
author Izabela Sałacińska
Patrycja Trojnar
Krisztina Éles Gebriné
Viktória Törő
Viktória Törő
Attila Sárváry
Paweł Więch
author_facet Izabela Sałacińska
Patrycja Trojnar
Krisztina Éles Gebriné
Viktória Törő
Viktória Törő
Attila Sárváry
Paweł Więch
author_sort Izabela Sałacińska
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionMedical simulation has become an integral part of medical student education. There is a limited body of literature comparing virtual and high-fidelity simulation in terms of effectiveness and student perception.MethodsA total of 130 medical students at the University of Rzeszów participated in this cross-sectional study. The respondents were divided into two groups: students who completed a selected scenario using a virtual patient (Body Interact) and students who completed a scenario using traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation (HFS). After completing the scenario, students filled in the following questionnaires: the Simulation Design Scale (SDS), the Educational Practices Questionnaire (EPQ), the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SSCL) and a customized survey questionnaire.ResultsThe study found no significant difference in the effectiveness of HFS between students exposed to either type of simulation. Detailed analysis within specific categories – problem-solving, teamwork, and active learning – also showed no significant differences between virtual and traditional HFS. Furthermore, there were no notable differences between virtual and traditional simulations regarding specific aspects such as satisfaction with learning, self-confidence in learning, and expectations. However, within the virtual simulation group, females rated active learning significantly higher. Students aged 24–33 rated satisfaction with learning, self-confidence, overall effectiveness and perception of HFS, problem-solving, and active learning more favorably. Additionally, the levels of perceived effectiveness and satisfaction of higher years students with HFS increased.ConclusionVirtual patient simulation and traditional HFS foster the development of practical skills, as well as soft skills of medical students in challenging situations.
format Article
id doaj-art-fabcd0e8c48d4a98969433468e1b6e09
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-858X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-fabcd0e8c48d4a98969433468e1b6e092025-02-10T06:48:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2025-02-011210.3389/fmed.2025.15237681523768A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perceptionIzabela Sałacińska0Patrycja Trojnar1Krisztina Éles Gebriné2Viktória Törő3Viktória Törő4Attila Sárváry5Paweł Więch6Faculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Health Care, Academy of Applied Sciences, Przemyśl, PolandDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, HungaryDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, HungaryDoctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, HungaryDepartment of Integrative Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, HungaryFaculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, PolandIntroductionMedical simulation has become an integral part of medical student education. There is a limited body of literature comparing virtual and high-fidelity simulation in terms of effectiveness and student perception.MethodsA total of 130 medical students at the University of Rzeszów participated in this cross-sectional study. The respondents were divided into two groups: students who completed a selected scenario using a virtual patient (Body Interact) and students who completed a scenario using traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation (HFS). After completing the scenario, students filled in the following questionnaires: the Simulation Design Scale (SDS), the Educational Practices Questionnaire (EPQ), the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SSCL) and a customized survey questionnaire.ResultsThe study found no significant difference in the effectiveness of HFS between students exposed to either type of simulation. Detailed analysis within specific categories – problem-solving, teamwork, and active learning – also showed no significant differences between virtual and traditional HFS. Furthermore, there were no notable differences between virtual and traditional simulations regarding specific aspects such as satisfaction with learning, self-confidence in learning, and expectations. However, within the virtual simulation group, females rated active learning significantly higher. Students aged 24–33 rated satisfaction with learning, self-confidence, overall effectiveness and perception of HFS, problem-solving, and active learning more favorably. Additionally, the levels of perceived effectiveness and satisfaction of higher years students with HFS increased.ConclusionVirtual patient simulation and traditional HFS foster the development of practical skills, as well as soft skills of medical students in challenging situations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1523768/fullsimulationeducational methodeffectivenessmedical studentssoft skillshigh fidelity simulation
spellingShingle Izabela Sałacińska
Patrycja Trojnar
Krisztina Éles Gebriné
Viktória Törő
Viktória Törő
Attila Sárváry
Paweł Więch
A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception
Frontiers in Medicine
simulation
educational method
effectiveness
medical students
soft skills
high fidelity simulation
title A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception
title_full A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception
title_fullStr A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception
title_short A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception
title_sort comparative study of traditional high fidelity manikin based simulation and virtual high fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception
topic simulation
educational method
effectiveness
medical students
soft skills
high fidelity simulation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1523768/full
work_keys_str_mv AT izabelasałacinska acomparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT patrycjatrojnar acomparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT krisztinaelesgebrine acomparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT viktoriatoro acomparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT viktoriatoro acomparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT attilasarvary acomparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT pawełwiech acomparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT izabelasałacinska comparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT patrycjatrojnar comparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT krisztinaelesgebrine comparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT viktoriatoro comparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT viktoriatoro comparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT attilasarvary comparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception
AT pawełwiech comparativestudyoftraditionalhighfidelitymanikinbasedsimulationandvirtualhighfidelitysimulationsconcerningtheireffectivenessandperception