Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein

Protein-nucleic acid phase separation has been implicated in many diseases such as viral infections, neurodegeneration, and cancer. There is great interest in identifying condensate modulators (CMODs), which are small molecules that alter the dynamics and functions of phase-separated condensates, as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Tong Quek, Cyna R. Shirazinejad, Christina L. Young, Kierra S. Hardy, Samuel Lim, Phillip J. Elms, David T. McSwiggen, Timothy J. Mitchison, Pamela A. Silver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:SLAS Discovery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472555225000139
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861227723423744
author Rui Tong Quek
Cyna R. Shirazinejad
Christina L. Young
Kierra S. Hardy
Samuel Lim
Phillip J. Elms
David T. McSwiggen
Timothy J. Mitchison
Pamela A. Silver
author_facet Rui Tong Quek
Cyna R. Shirazinejad
Christina L. Young
Kierra S. Hardy
Samuel Lim
Phillip J. Elms
David T. McSwiggen
Timothy J. Mitchison
Pamela A. Silver
author_sort Rui Tong Quek
collection DOAJ
description Protein-nucleic acid phase separation has been implicated in many diseases such as viral infections, neurodegeneration, and cancer. There is great interest in identifying condensate modulators (CMODs), which are small molecules that alter the dynamics and functions of phase-separated condensates, as a potential therapeutic modality. Most CMODs were identified in cellular high-content screens (HCS) where micron-scale condensates were characterized by fluorescence microscopy. These approaches lack information on protein dynamics, are limited by microscope resolution, and are insensitive to subtle condensation phenotypes missed by overfit analysis pipelines. Here, we evaluate two alternative cell-based assays: high-throughput single molecule tracking (htSMT) and proximity-based condensate biosensors using NanoBIT (split luciferase) and NanoBRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) technologies. We applied these methods to evaluate condensation of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein under GSK3 inhibitor treatment, which we had previously identified in our HCS campaign to induce condensation with well-defined structure-activity relationships (SAR). Using htSMT, we observed robust changes in N protein diffusion as early as 3 h post GSK3 inhibition. Proximity-based N biosensors also reliably reported on condensation, enabling the rapid assaying of large compound libraries with a readout independent of imaging. Both htSMT and proximity-based biosensors performed well in a screening format and provided information on CMOD activity that was complementary to HCS. We expect that this expanded toolkit for interrogating phase-separated proteins will accelerate the identification of CMODs for important therapeutic targets.
format Article
id doaj-art-fea01bc51b3b4ff4ba1335553b4ed2ae
institution Kabale University
issn 2472-5552
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series SLAS Discovery
spelling doaj-art-fea01bc51b3b4ff4ba1335553b4ed2ae2025-02-10T04:34:39ZengElsevierSLAS Discovery2472-55522025-03-0131100220Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteinRui Tong Quek0Cyna R. Shirazinejad1Christina L. Young2Kierra S. Hardy3Samuel Lim4Phillip J. Elms5David T. McSwiggen6Timothy J. Mitchison7Pamela A. Silver8Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USAEikon Therapeutics, Hayward, California, USAEikon Therapeutics, Hayward, California, USADepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USADepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USAEikon Therapeutics, Hayward, California, USAEikon Therapeutics, Hayward, California, USADepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Corresponding authors at: Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Corresponding authors at: Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Protein-nucleic acid phase separation has been implicated in many diseases such as viral infections, neurodegeneration, and cancer. There is great interest in identifying condensate modulators (CMODs), which are small molecules that alter the dynamics and functions of phase-separated condensates, as a potential therapeutic modality. Most CMODs were identified in cellular high-content screens (HCS) where micron-scale condensates were characterized by fluorescence microscopy. These approaches lack information on protein dynamics, are limited by microscope resolution, and are insensitive to subtle condensation phenotypes missed by overfit analysis pipelines. Here, we evaluate two alternative cell-based assays: high-throughput single molecule tracking (htSMT) and proximity-based condensate biosensors using NanoBIT (split luciferase) and NanoBRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) technologies. We applied these methods to evaluate condensation of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein under GSK3 inhibitor treatment, which we had previously identified in our HCS campaign to induce condensation with well-defined structure-activity relationships (SAR). Using htSMT, we observed robust changes in N protein diffusion as early as 3 h post GSK3 inhibition. Proximity-based N biosensors also reliably reported on condensation, enabling the rapid assaying of large compound libraries with a readout independent of imaging. Both htSMT and proximity-based biosensors performed well in a screening format and provided information on CMOD activity that was complementary to HCS. We expect that this expanded toolkit for interrogating phase-separated proteins will accelerate the identification of CMODs for important therapeutic targets.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472555225000139Biomolecular condensatesHigh content screeningsingle molecule trackingSplit luciferaseNanoBRETDynamics
spellingShingle Rui Tong Quek
Cyna R. Shirazinejad
Christina L. Young
Kierra S. Hardy
Samuel Lim
Phillip J. Elms
David T. McSwiggen
Timothy J. Mitchison
Pamela A. Silver
Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein
SLAS Discovery
Biomolecular condensates
High content screening
single molecule tracking
Split luciferase
NanoBRET
Dynamics
title Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein
title_full Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein
title_short Comparative evaluation of cell-based assay technologies for scoring drug-induced condensation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein
title_sort comparative evaluation of cell based assay technologies for scoring drug induced condensation of sars cov 2 nucleocapsid protein
topic Biomolecular condensates
High content screening
single molecule tracking
Split luciferase
NanoBRET
Dynamics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472555225000139
work_keys_str_mv AT ruitongquek comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT cynarshirazinejad comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT christinalyoung comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT kierrashardy comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT samuellim comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT phillipjelms comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT davidtmcswiggen comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT timothyjmitchison comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein
AT pamelaasilver comparativeevaluationofcellbasedassaytechnologiesforscoringdruginducedcondensationofsarscov2nucleocapsidprotein